Teams

RHCC YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-02vs NJ PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKari Eckert / Lindsay Gordon vs Lisa Kellogg / Jennifer Davis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoelle Delisa / Nicolle McKinney vs Christine Loehr / Laura Kelly0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKelly Brewster vs Jennifer Arnold4-6, 3-6
2024-08-12vs BP REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoelle Delisa / Tiffany Skiles vs Mandy Staehler / Ashley Lougheed3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicolle McKinney / Kelly Brewster vs Meredith Barnes / Angela Martin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-05vs MVCC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesTiffany Skiles / Joelle Delisa vs Debra O'Donnell / Margaret Keslosky6-1, 6-0
2024-07-29vs NJ PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsay Gordon / Kelly Brewster vs Carrie Poulsen / Laura Garrido7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Skiles / Joelle Delisa vs Lisa Kellogg / Laura Kelly4-6, 3-6
2024-07-22vs NJ REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Beth Trammell vs Deena Green / Ingrid Palmer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKari Eckert / Lindsay Gordon vs Karen Kirby / Jennifer Gardner4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Lindsay Gordon
published
3.00
Kelly Brewster
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Terri Whitehair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Tori Schultz
published
2.79
Joelle Delisa
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Beth Trammell
published 3
2.69
Cheryl Crawford
published 3
2.60
Tiffany Skiles
published
2.57
Kari Eckert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jill Haug
published
Nicolle McKinney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joelle Delisa + Kari Eckert3350% games+10.1% vs expected
Joelle Delisa + Tiffany Skiles10655% games+5.9% vs expected
Kari Eckert + Terri Whitehair123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Gordon
30W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Kelly Brewster
46W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Terri Whitehair
58W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Tori Schultz
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Joelle Delisa
25W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Beth Trammell
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cheryl Crawford
10W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
Tiffany Skiles
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Kari Eckert
64W–87L career · 2 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Jill Haug
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicolle McKinney
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.