Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Haas

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Barbara Hurt-Simmons vs Diane Mancini / Linda Larsen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Barbara Hurt-Simmons vs Renee Facciola / Victoria Pollock6-2, 6-2
2021-12-01vs Players Club - M. AbramsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Connie Donato vs Ellen Harvey / Karen Terzano6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Michelle Thomas vs Mercy Abrams / Patrice Clapacs4-6, 2-6
2021-11-11vs Pelican Bay South - N HughesWon 10
W#2 DoublesConnie Donato / Marlea Bowser vs Catherine Booth / Rosemary Marinone6-0, 6-1
2021-10-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Thomas / Claudia Hammon vs Kalli Kustas / Eileen Leone6-2, 6-2
2021-10-21vs World Tennis Club - K. PhillipsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Claudia Hammon vs Kathleen Phillips / Cathy Miles6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-14Won 20
W#2 DoublesClaudia Hammon / Jacqui ONeal Privitere vs Diane Sullivan / Janet Farwell6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Connie Donato vs Renate Dietrich / Dawn Jones6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Donna Curry
published 4
3.56
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.27
Nada Uzelac
published
3.26
Linda Koenig
published
3.25
Marlea Bowser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
2.97
2.94
Claudia Hammon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Glenna Haas
published 3
Julie Oberweis
published
Tara Porte
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Curry
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Beth Rainey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
Nada Uzelac
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Linda Koenig
51W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Marlea Bowser
168W–139L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Hurt-Simmons
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Jacqui ONeal Privitere
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Claudia Hammon
80W–104L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Glenna Haas
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Oberweis
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tara Porte
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.