Teams

OC LLW Acing Gracefully - Los Cab - Susan Sat11am

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Bullette / Gilda Banta vs Patti DiTullio / Julie Ahlert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-15vs OC Love Hurts - Palisades - BrooksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeona Tohill / AMY MAO vs Julie Ahlert / Christine Garber6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKate Cameron / Karin Wiseman vs Julie Ebert / Victoria Harrington2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKate Cameron / AMY MAO vs Hellene Thurston / Julie Ahlert3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKate Cameron / Sheri Hall vs Hellene Thurston / Lori Ratzlaff6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTeri Matheny / Christine Bullette vs Laurie Rounds / Christine Garber6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Wolfe / Leona Tohill vs Aly Shepard / Cissy la Roche6-2, 6-3
2023-05-13vs OC Love Hurts - Palisades - BrooksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheri Hall / Kate Cameron vs Hellene Thurston / Melissa Luu6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTeri Matheny / Leona Tohill vs Ginger Vasquez / Ann Matich6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Kate Cameron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Leona Tohill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Christine Bullette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Teri Matheny
published
3.08
AMY MAO
published 3.5
3.00
Bridget Conkle
published 3.5
2.95
Gilda Banta
published 3
2.77
Eileen Asahi
published 3
2.62
Connie Wolfe
published 3
Nancy Jewell
published
Sheri Hall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leona Tohill + Christine Bullette14460% games+9.3% vs expected
Bridget Conkle + Eileen Asahi2344% gamesnot enough data
Christine Bullette + Kate Cameron3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kate Cameron
109W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Leona Tohill
68W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Christine Bullette
56W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Teri Matheny
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
AMY MAO
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Bridget Conkle
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Gilda Banta
21W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Eileen Asahi
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Connie Wolfe
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Nancy Jewell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Hall
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.