Teams

Plant City Ninjas - J. Wyckoff

2021 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-08-22vs Cheval Smash Sistas - N. CraneLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Wyckoff / Julianna Holbrook vs Jacqueline Hayes / Robin Perrone4-6, 4-6
2021-08-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDama Register / Julianna Holbrook vs Krissy Heybroek / Catherine Davidson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Adkins / Julianna Holbrook vs Deb Spears / Merbaliz Ferris2-6, 1-6
2021-07-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Jeanette Wise vs Dora Rattes / Sherry Peterson2-6, 4-6
2021-07-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Dolan / Julianna Holbrook vs Laura Fetters / Michelle Hare1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Jayme Kosar vs Risa Blake / Katherine Grichnik4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-28vs River Hills - J. O'LearyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Wyckoff / Cynthia Scaletta vs Renee Rasmussen / Jen Bradley6-2, 6-2
2021-06-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Funk / Julianna Holbrook vs Ronghui You / Xue Chan7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Scaletta / Karen Bateman vs Lin Zhang / Hong Liu0-6, 2-6
2021-06-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeanette Wise / Julianna Holbrook vs Tracey Tupler / Crystal Vanmeter1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCynthia Scaletta / Danielle Miller vs Catherine Davidson / Stephanie Rumbley0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Stacey Adkins vs Monica Eiermann / Lindsay Davitt3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Zoila Vidal
published
2.55
Patricia Smith
published
2.55
Jackie Wyckoff
published 3
2.47
Jayme Kosar
published
2.37
Julianna Holbrook
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Beth Larson
published 2.5
1.99
Cynthia Scaletta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Scaletta + Zoila Vidal4164% games+5.3% vs expected
Julianna Holbrook + Cynthia Scaletta52134% games−10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zoila Vidal
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
0%8%92%
2.68
Patricia Smith
6W–10L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Jackie Wyckoff
8W–17L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jayme Kosar
7W–15L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.47
Julianna Holbrook
60W–151L career · 9 lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Beth Larson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Cynthia Scaletta
46W–85L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.