Teams

Wrc/Vanitha

2024 Broward Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-23vs Midtown/AAlvarezWon 10
W#2 DoublesMartha Lucia Alvarez / Mayra Squarini vs Jennifer Rhett / Brianna Haggard6-2, 6-1
2024-08-30vs Broward/Lazar/18&OverCombo5.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesNatalia Vesga / Xia Jin vs Natalia Smyth / Kelly Leong Poi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Llovera / Mayra Squarini vs Florina Lazar / Simone Garrett6-7, 5-7
2024-08-09vs Broward/Lazar/18&OverCombo5.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesVanitha Vasudevan / Xia Jin vs Ana Milano / Vanessa Silva6-3, 3-0
2024-07-19vs Broward/Lazar/18&OverCombo5.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesVanitha Vasudevan / Xia Jin vs Ana Milano / Vanessa Silva3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Agustina Sanchez / Mayra Squarini vs Adriana Gonzalez / Kelly Leong Poi6-4, 6-3
2024-07-12vs Midtown/AAlvarezWon 10
W#1 DoublesXia Jin / Maria Agustina Sanchez vs Veronica Cornell / Eva Roshberg6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Natalia Vesga
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.86
Xia Jin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Maria Agustina Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Mayra Squarini
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Maria Llovera
published
2.76
Chizo Obanu
published 3
2.69
Marycelys Delgado
published
2.69
Debbie Leon
published 3
2.60
2.54
2.54
Vanitha Vasudevan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mayra Squarini + Maria Agustina Sanchez4166% games+11.3% vs expected
Maria Agustina Sanchez + Xia Jin10360% games+10.3% vs expected
Martha Lucia Alvarez + Maria Agustina Sanchez134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalia Vesga
39W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
3
Xia Jin
65W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Maria Agustina Sanchez
53W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Mayra Squarini
59W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Maria Llovera
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Chizo Obanu
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
Marycelys Delgado
8W–33L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Debbie Leon
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Martha Lucia Alvarez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
Maria Patricia Sanchez
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Vanitha Vasudevan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.