Teams

BC-AltaVista/MauriceKogan7.0

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 12 11:00 AM
Palos Verdes Tennis Club
Sep 19 12:00 PM
Alta Vista Racquet Center
Sep 26 11:00 AM
Palos Verdes Tennis Club
Oct 3 12:00 PM
Alta Vista Racquet Center
Oct 10 11:00 AM
Palos Verdes Tennis Club
2026-08-29vs BC-PVTC/DavidStone7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaurice Kogon / Keith French vs David Stone / David Stumfall2-6, 2-6
2026-08-22vs BC-PVTC/DavidStone7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJames Do / John Abelson vs Richard Pennington / Volker Wypyszyk6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeith French / Roche Palileo vs Lennie Brand / David Stone6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMark Blons / Gian Starinieri vs Nam Lai / Jeffrey Levee6-2, 6-2
2026-08-15vs BC-PVTC/DavidStone7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Tomasello / Hiro Saito vs Nam Lai / David Stone6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeith French / Roche Palileo vs Brian O'Sullivan / John Durnell6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBruce Logan / John Abelson vs Gary Michel / Steve Hirano6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · BC Men - 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-AltaVista/MauriceKogan7.01030114
2BC-PVTC/DavidStone7.00103632

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Bruce Logan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
James Do
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Keith French
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Mark Blons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
John Abelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gian Starinieri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Tong
published
Hiro Saito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Tomasello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maurice Kogon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roche Palileo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Eperthener
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Tong + Keith French404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Logan
66W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
James Do
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
3.68
Keith French
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Mark Blons
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
John Abelson
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Gian Starinieri
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Greg Tong
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Hiro Saito
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joe Tomasello
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Maurice Kogon
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Roche Palileo
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Eperthener
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.