Teams

MTC Meyer

2024 Richmond Combo Weekday · Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-22vs SCC Coon ComboLost 01
L#2 DoublesNorma Kimbrel / Lindsay Hardage vs Parker Coon / Marianne Lane4-6, 5-7
2024-11-20vs WW Double Trouble - RacelisWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Pamela Stidham vs Dana Johnson / Britta Petersson6-3, 6-3
2024-11-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Pitts / Pamela Stidham vs Elizabeth Hoover / Christine Lemons5-7, 1-6
2024-11-06vs CCV- DnR ButlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Melissa Miller vs Emily Edens / Emily Gottwald1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Stidham / Nancy Pitts vs Donna Butler / Lane Mosby6-1, 6-2
2024-10-30vs TDC 7.5 BraggLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Corinne Hilbert vs Lauren Duke / Ali Riley6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Pitts / Pamela Stidham vs Annmarie Lobred / Justine Sherman3-6, 4-6
2024-10-25vs ACAC BradtLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Stidham / Nancy Pitts vs Julie Ruth / Julie Rison1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Nancy Pitts
published
3.81
Lindsay Hardage
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Diana Duddy
published 4
3.48
Jeannie Langnau
published
3.47
Pamela Stidham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.15
Lindsey Scammell
published
3.12
Robin Meyer
published
Corinne Hilbert
published 3
Kathleen Laroche
published
Nancy Reynolds
published
Norma Kimbrel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannie Langnau + Robin Meyer2542% gamesnot enough data
Jeannie Langnau + Nancy Reynolds404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Pitts
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Lindsay Hardage
94W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Diana Duddy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jeannie Langnau
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Pamela Stidham
62W–94L career · 5 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
Lindsey Scammell
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Robin Meyer
15W–23L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Corinne Hilbert
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Laroche
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Reynolds
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Norma Kimbrel
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.