Teams

Coulson/PH

2022 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 8.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-12vs Mullenix/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Fox / Kim Stewart vs Rebekah Herrick / Andrea Martin6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Scroggs / Glenda Bullock vs Linda Baugher / Susan Limekiller6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Largent / Janie Coulson vs Roxanna Hanseth / Karin Duke2-6, 1-6
2022-04-30vs Wilson/PHWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Scroggs / Glenda Bullock vs Beth Latham / Sondra Reynolds6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hassell / Janie Coulson vs Nancy Paulie / Deborah Mocnik7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSharon Cash / Terry Largent vs Pelestene Rogers / Gail Gillock7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-21vs OK/Rahhal/55&over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherry Fine / Terry Largent vs Sandra Leos / Pam Rahhal5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Cash / Kimberly Oliver vs Mary Jo Tasker / Patti Burton7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Fox / Janie Coulson vs Betsy Bryce / Kimberly Jones6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-10vs OK/Rahhal/55&over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Hassell / Kimberly Oliver vs Sandra Leos / Pam Rahhal5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Scroggs / Laura Bailey vs Mary Jo Tasker / Diane Wood6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMary Fox / Allison Eve vs Betsy Bryce / Kimberly Jones3-6, 6-7
2022-04-09vs Wilson/PHWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerry Largent / Sherry Fine vs Gail Gillock / Pelestene Rogers3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Bailey / Amanda Scroggs vs Deborah Mocnik / Nancy Paulie2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanie Coulson / Mary Fox vs Cindy Noyes / Theresa Nichols6-3, 6-1
2022-04-02vs OK/Rahhal/55&over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Fox / Allison Eve vs Betsy Bryce / Kimberly Jones6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSherry Fine / Terry Largent vs Sandra Leos / Pam Rahhal2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Hassell / Kim Stewart vs Michelle Oatman / Diane Wood7-6, 6-3
2022-03-26vs Mullenix/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerry Largent / Sherry Fine vs Roxanna Hanseth / Stephanie Pugh7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Cash / Kim Stewart vs Susan Limekiller / Sandy Jones6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Fox / Allison Eve vs Wendy Brooks / Linda Baugher6-4, 7-6
2022-03-19vs Wilson/PHWon 21
L#1 DoublesJana Brookover / Allison Eve vs Deborah Mocnik / Nancy Paulie2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSherry Fine / Kimberly Oliver vs Gail Gillock / Theresa Nichols6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Fox / Glenda Bullock vs Gail Kelly / Sondra Reynolds6-1, 6-0
2022-03-05vs Mullenix/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Cash / Kimberly Oliver vs Wendy Brooks / Rebekah Herrick6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaura Bailey / Jana Brookover vs Stephanie Pugh / Cheryl Sumners2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Allman / Janie Coulson vs Gloria Mullenix / Mia Vahlberg6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Rahhal/55&over8.0W72171029257
2Coulson/PH54151228238
3Wilson/PH36141331239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Amanda Scroggs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Laura Allman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Sharon Cash
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.98
Michelle Hassell
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.93
Sherry Fine
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.30
Terry Largent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Allison Eve
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Glenda Bullock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jana Brookover
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Janie Coulson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Laura Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Fox
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Fine + Laura Allman8457% games+3.6% vs expected
Terry Largent + Sherry Fine5551% games+2.2% vs expected
Allison Eve + Laura Bailey8360% games+2.1% vs expected
Allison Eve + Kimberly Oliver151354% games−0.5% vs expected
Sharon Cash + Sherry Fine151850% games−1.5% vs expected
Allison Eve + Janie Coulson71047% games−1.7% vs expected
Mary Fox + Amanda Scroggs5354% games−1.7% vs expected
Jana Brookover + Laura Allman5452% games−10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Scroggs
101W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Laura Allman
57W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
Sharon Cash
52W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
Michelle Hassell
81W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.98
Sherry Fine
81W–85L career · 8 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.93
Terry Largent
100W–65L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Allison Eve
62W–73L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Kimberly Oliver
80W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
3
Glenda Bullock
22W–30L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Jana Brookover
49W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janie Coulson
42W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Bailey
48W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Fox
35W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.