Teams

RGAC/Lafferty W4.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W4.0S

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesDebra Wood / SHELLEY ARKELL vs Tammy French / Elizabeth Smith6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMisty Carlyle vs August Wood3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathie Norris / Elaine Jones vs Denelle Alexander / Blaine Eschenburg3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDana Johnson / Susan Heston vs Silvia Tapia / Bonnie Black6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W4.0S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carla Brooks
published 4
3.71
3.70
3.69
Chris Sonnen
published 4
3.60
Kim Combs
published
3.56
Debra Gonzales
published 4
3.46
SHELLEY ARKELL
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Hsiao-Lan Wilson
published
3.32
Misty Carlyle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kathie Norris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Oelke
published
Susan Heston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Gonzales + Christina Lafferty2738% games−8.4% vs expected
Christina Lafferty + SHELLEY ARKELL134 matchesnot enough data
Debra Gonzales + Kim Combs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carla Brooks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christina Lafferty
15W–27L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jeannie Westmoreland
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Chris Sonnen
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Kim Combs
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Debra Gonzales
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
SHELLEY ARKELL
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Hsiao-Lan Wilson
30W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Misty Carlyle
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Kathie Norris
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Oelke
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Heston
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.