Teams

Furqueron/40/7.5/MC/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 7.5 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-16vs Ellis/40/7.5/MC/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Karam / Chris Singletary vs Timothy Ellis / Greg Martin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Curley / Slattery Johnson vs John Barr / Chip Layton6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Schadwinkel / Jesse Waller vs Edward Burchett / Hai Nguyen6-7, 6-7
2025-10-09vs Ellis/40/7.5/MC/BTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJason Curley / Chris Tilley vs John Barr / Chip Layton4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Fiser / Steven Anderson vs Juan Rangel / Greg Martin4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-18vs Ellis/40/7.5/MC/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJared Fry / Chris Singletary vs Timothy Ellis / Vince Truong6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJason Curley / Jesse Waller vs Edward Burchett / Todd Eppler6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Furqueron / Eric Basinger vs Juan Rangel / Hai Nguyen3-6, 1-6
2025-09-11vs Ellis/40/7.5/MC/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJason Curley / Eric Basinger vs Robert Kyle / Edward Burchett6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJared Fry / Jesse Waller vs Todd Eppler / Juan Rangel6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichard Karam / Slattery Johnson vs John Barr / Chip Layton6-3, 6-0
2025-09-04vs Ellis/40/7.5/MC/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Curley / Jesse Waller vs Juan Rangel / Hai Nguyen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRichard Karam / Chris Singletary vs Edward Burchett / Vince Truong6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJared Fry / Steven Anderson vs John Barr / Chip Layton6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Furqueron/40/7.5/MC/BTC329615128
2Ellis/40/7.5/MC/BTC236919150

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Jared Fry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
David Schadwinkel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Richard Karam
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Jason Curley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Slattery Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Mike Fiser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Nick Nunn
published
3.58
Chris Singletary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Jesse Waller
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.40
Chris Tilley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Brian Furqueron
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Eric Basinger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Slattery Johnson + Mike Fiser4267% games+17.6% vs expected
Brian Furqueron + Jesse Waller4158% games+1.5% vs expected
Brian Furqueron + Eric Basinger2637% games−0.1% vs expected
Brian Furqueron + Slattery Johnson3255% gamesnot enough data
Jesse Waller + Jason Curley213 matchesnot enough data
Jason Curley + Jared Fry213 matchesnot enough data
Richard Karam + Jared Fry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Fry
48W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
David Schadwinkel
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Richard Karam
45W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Jason Curley
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Slattery Johnson
78W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.69
Mike Fiser
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
Nick Nunn
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Chris Singletary
55W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Jesse Waller
32W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Chris Tilley
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Brian Furqueron
47W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Eric Basinger
31W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.