Teams

Armonk Tennis Club - Jimenez

2025 40&Over Mixed · 7.0 W

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-25vs Club Fit Briarcliff CommandersLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Long / Grissel Weseman vs Danielle Powers / Paul Powers6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaul Monges / Patricia Monges vs Jeanette Kim / Lane Bonadies4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesOlena Polakoff / Luis M Jimenez vs Alexis Dorst / Sean Foster6-7, 1-6
2025-04-11vs Saw Mill SlicersLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Long / Grissel Weseman vs Robert Greenfeld / Jessica Cambareri6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllan Colaco / Vanessa Colaco vs Chris Beels / Carole Allers3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPhillip Raclyn / Gabriela Selyem vs Jun Yoon / Sara Hooper6-7, 3-6
2025-04-06vs Club Fit Briarcliff CommandersWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrissel Weseman / Richard Long vs Lane Bonadies / Paula Park6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Starker / Felisse Starker vs Dina Katz / Jonathan Satran6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGabriela Selyem / Phillip Raclyn vs MARC LEVITT / Caryn Silverman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-14vs WTC: Mix 7.0 TrickstersLost 12
W#1 DoublesGrissel Weseman / Richard Long vs Jennifer Murphy / Dara Bunhim4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Monges / Raul Monges vs Leana Rahman / Robert Chun6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesFelisse Starker / David Starker vs Laura Buckley / Ryan Fiftal1-6, 6-7
2025-03-08vs WAT: Harris/PiksinksaLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Long / Grissel Weseman vs Joanna Robin / Rodney Rideout3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesFelisse Starker / David Starker vs Euching Lin / Hector Rodriguez3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVanessa Colaco / Allan Colaco vs Susanna Daniel / Daniel Kittredge2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRichard Long / Grissel Weseman vs Sarah Fraser / Igor Shuli3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRaul Monges / Patricia Monges vs Yong Gao / Shujuan Bao2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLuis M Jimenez / Sarah Cion vs Justo Reyes / Susan Nask3-6, 3-4
2025-02-22vs WTC: Mix 7.0 Mixed NutsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Starker / Felisse Starker vs Christina Adair / Jorge Linero6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGabriela Selyem / Luis M Jimenez vs Kelly Warrick / Joseph Galazin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Monges / Raul Monges vs Maria Das Neves / Steve Petricone6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-02vs CRRC: No Strings AttachedLost 02
L#1 DoublesLuis M Jimenez / Sarah Cion vs Marc Roth / Mandy Yasinski6-2, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPatricia Monges / Raul Monges vs Yaysoon Phillips / Marc Spivack1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Richard Long
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Luis M Jimenez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Vanessa Colaco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Allan Colaco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.79
Phillip Raclyn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Felisse Starker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Gabriela Selyem
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Grissel Weseman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Olena Polakoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Monges
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Raul Monges
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Sarah Cion
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Long + Grissel Weseman351756% gamesnot enough data
Raul Monges + Patricia Monges42935% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Cion + Luis M Jimenez224 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Colaco + Allan Colaco134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Richard Long
98W–87L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Luis M Jimenez
43W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Vanessa Colaco
32W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Allan Colaco
57W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Phillip Raclyn
76W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Felisse Starker
98W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Gabriela Selyem
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Grissel Weseman
66W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olena Polakoff
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Monges
6W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raul Monges
24W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Cion
41W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.