← Teams

GLVR-Wellman

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Rachel Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.66
Christina Melander
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 4
3.56
Gabriela McIntosh
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.47
Ann Arp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.45
Michelle Johnson
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Megan Finn
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Bennett-Hanes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
—
Christie Herkert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Jean Zuber Marshburn
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Teufelin Traylen
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Hilary Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results12 ties
2024-06-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesErin Casey / Rachel Ritchie vs Tiffany Bowie / Kari Hastings5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-22Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Michelle Johnson vs Cyndie Lempesis / Janice Couture7-6, 6-0
2024-06-22Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Michelle Johnson vs Nancy Burdyshaw / Kay Coghlan6-4, 6-0
2024-06-21Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Michelle Johnson vs Diane Murray / Kristi Gonzalez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-03Won 3–2
W#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Christine Bennett-Hanes vs Alison Davis / Catherine Leedy6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRachel Ritchie vs Kristin Campbell6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHilary Johnson / Sarah Robertson vs Cara Liu / Kim Wright6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichelle Johnson vs Janae Pyle6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Shawn Sefchick vs Laura Laney / Heidi Cronn6-3, 6-2
2024-02-24Won 3–2
L#1 DoublesChristie Herkert / Ann Arp vs Jennifer Potter / Alena Lauritsen6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Melissa Smith6-4, 5-5
L#2 DoublesKaie Wellman / Christine Bennett-Hanes vs Barbara Dusicka / Katherine McMillan6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesErin Casey vs Kourtnie Katayama7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShawn Sefchick / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Margaret Convery / Caryn Cohen6-3, 6-4
2024-02-18Won 3–2
L#1 DoublesAnn Arp / Michelle Johnson vs Edwardeen Hilts / Laura Maginnis6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Tina Prassas6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErin Casey / Gabriela McIntosh vs Molly Taylor / Jing Li6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesTeufelin Traylen vs Rachel Connell6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick vs Kathy Cook / Cara Williams6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-11Lost 2–3
L#1 DoublesErin Casey / Michelle Johnson vs Cathleen Lang / Lyudmila Leissler2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Lia Irvin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Oliver / Megan Finn vs Gretchen Newcomb / Rachel Novak6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRachel Ritchie vs Brittany Donnelly6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHilary Johnson / Teufelin Traylen vs Elizabeth Raman / Miki Han6-4, 6-2
2024-02-04Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Christine Bennett-Hanes vs Helen Chen / Shannon Chen6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGabriela McIntosh vs Jill Boyce6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Sarah Robertson vs Heather Lee / Betty Roux6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMegan Finn vs Susan Elmer6-0, 6-1
2024-02-03Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesRachel Ritchie / Kate Oliver vs Helen Chen / Shannon Chen6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Laura Rundle6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaie Wellman / Erin Casey vs Susan Elmer / Betty Roux6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHilary Johnson / Sarah Robertson vs Lara Greenberg / Janet Ha6-3, 6-1
2024-01-20Won 4–1
W#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Christie Herkert vs Kara Petracca / Jocelyn Smith6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichelle Johnson vs Natasha Weinstock6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick vs Jennifer Bane / Jane Moffat6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesChristina Melander vs Shelly Griffith6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Sarah Robertson vs Amelia Ryan / Amy Pickens6-1, 6-1
2024-01-07Lost 1–4
L#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Ann Arp vs Sarah Marcille / Heidi Palena6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Katrina Phillips7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristie Herkert / Erin Casey vs Vanessa Weber / Teresa Darling7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Johnson vs Danielle Barrett6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSarah Robertson / Hilary Johnson vs Melissa Jacobs / Julie Kafoury3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Ritchie
75W–19L career
0%67%33%
4.05
4
Christina Melander
111W–81L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Gabriela McIntosh
111W–90L career
18%82%0%
3.56
3.5
Ann Arp
39W–27L career
0%80%20%
3.47
3.5
Michelle Johnson
82W–103L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Megan Finn
32W–17L career
0%98%2%
3.34
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Christine Bennett-Hanes
84W–61L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Christie Herkert
30W–31L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jean Zuber Marshburn
83W–65L career
6%94%0%
3.16
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3.5
Teufelin Traylen
77W–65L career
14%86%0%
3.08
3
Hilary Johnson
68W–64L career
0%95%5%
2.90

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.