Teams

Kennedy/Knoxville

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Adult 55 & over Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-09vs McFee/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Kathleen Zitzman vs Joan Ewers / Margot Dunn1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGinny Davis / Mary Ellen Kilburn vs Katty McFee / Mary Sneed6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRosemary Canada / Lucianne Price vs Elizabeth Jarvis / Elizabeth Campbell2-3
2026-05-03vs Mart/Ren/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Christina Johnson vs Sheri Kilbey / Teri Williams6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLucianne Price / Rosemary Canada vs Jo Davis / Lori Barrett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-27vs Eagen/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesLea Ann Fields / Rosemary Canada vs Sandi Wilson / Gina O'Neil1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Tammy Simpson vs Wesley Fuller / Shantel Houston7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen Kilburn / Lucianne Price vs Michele Hall Craig / Michelle Luna6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-26vs Houck/Knoxville/55-4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Lucianne Price vs Heidi Ellsworth / Jacque Clem0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTammy Simpson / Robyn Raley vs Barbara Miller / Allison Chandler4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Johnson / Ginny Davis vs Lisa Gangelhoff / Laura Ivey7-5, 6-2
2026-04-11vs McFee/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinny Davis / Rita Edlein vs Dena Teague / Lori Thompson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Johnson / Mary Ellen Kilburn vs Elizabeth Jarvis / Mary Sneed5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Kathleen Zitzman vs Katty McFee / Lindsay McNabb7-5, 7-6
2026-03-28vs Eagen/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Christina Johnson vs Michele Hall Craig / Gina O'Neil5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLucianne Price / Rosemary Canada vs Jodie Campbell / Michelle Luna3-6, 2-6
2026-03-26vs Mart/Ren/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Simpson / Robyn Raley vs Sandra Smith / Angie Herzog4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGinny Davis / Christina Johnson vs Teri Williams / Lori Barrett7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Lea Ann Fields vs Jo Davis / Sheri Kilbey4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Houck/Knoxville/55-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesA Marie Kennedy / Rosemary Canada vs Kris Gompert / Jasmine Dabbs1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRita Edlein / Ginny Davis vs Barbara Miller / Lynn Johnson0-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Johnson / Lea Ann Fields vs Lisa Gangelhoff / Chieko Lambert5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 55 & over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
A Marie Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Lea Ann Fields
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Tammy Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Robyn Raley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Rita Edlein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Mary Ellen Kilburn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Ginny Davis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.35
Kathleen Zitzman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Lucianne Price
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.20
Rosemary Canada
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Raley + Tammy Simpson6255% games+9.9% vs expected
A Marie Kennedy + Tammy Simpson8358% games+4.4% vs expected
Robyn Raley + A Marie Kennedy2447% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Simpson + Rita Edlein5161% gamesnot enough data
A Marie Kennedy + Lea Ann Fields3253% gamesnot enough data
Lucianne Price + Rosemary Canada044 matchesnot enough data
Robyn Raley + Lea Ann Fields224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Zitzman + Mary Ellen Kilburn134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
A Marie Kennedy
22W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Lea Ann Fields
26W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Tammy Simpson
36W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Robyn Raley
20W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Rita Edlein
13W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
Mary Ellen Kilburn
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
4
Ginny Davis
15W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.45
Kathleen Zitzman
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Lucianne Price
7W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Rosemary Canada
6W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.