Teams

Guehl-Rosemary Beach

2026 OWB Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-10vs Lochan-Camp CreekWon 31
L#1 DoublesKim Lepley / Ann Marie Covington vs Shea Demello / Amy Mausert4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDeanna Young vs Geeta Lochan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanet Guehl / Jodi Pratt vs Anne Conklin / Stacy Murphy6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLindsey Harp / Yana Morgan vs Sharon FantoSmith / Donna Merkel6-0, 6-3
2026-04-19vs Wrobleski-Hidden DunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJuju Milam / Christina Langford vs Jamie Wrobleski / Victoria Santa Maria6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesYana Morgan vs Christina Mitchell6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJodi Pratt / Mendy Melancon vs Barbara Glowaski / Diane Cole6-2, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Wrobleski-Hidden DunesWon 40
W#1 DoublesKim Lepley / Ann Marie Covington vs Julie Grill / Donna Norfleet6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDeanna Young vs Ashley Busch7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobyn Prince / Jennifer Bekkers vs Julie Campbell / Linda Cappadona4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYana Morgan / Mendy Melancon vs Merrisa Ingram / Jamie Wrobleski6-4, 6-1
2026-03-29vs Fitzhugh-PCRCWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnn Talkington / Mendy Melancon vs Teri Cable / Julie Steves6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKim Lepley vs Linda Fitzhugh1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDeanna Young / Juju Milam vs Ashley Tate / Ingrid Knight4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYana Morgan / Lindsey Harp vs Kathyrn Beiswanger / Tiffany Forrester6-2, 6-1
2026-03-22vs OWB/SchneiderSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristina Langford / Mendy Melancon vs Jacqueline Ward / Mary Brandman5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesYana Morgan vs Sherry Kaelin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnn Marie Covington / Ann Talkington vs Gloria Schulz / Tina Rickards-Fuller3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bekkers / Jennifer Brown vs Brittany Tarver / Maria Schneider3-6, 0-6
2026-03-01vs Lochan-Camp CreekWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristina Langford / Jodi Pratt vs Liz Branch / Shea Demello6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMendy Melancon / Robyn Prince vs Kelly Lindell / Trudy Marlow6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Guehl / Juju Milam vs Donna Merkel / Stacy Murphy6-0, 6-0
2026-02-22vs Fitzhugh-PCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMendy Melancon / Ann Talkington vs Kathyrn Beiswanger / Teri Cable6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDeanna Young vs Julie Steves6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanet Guehl / Robyn Prince vs Ashley Tate / Tiffany Forrester7-6, 6-2
2026-02-15vs OWB/SchneiderLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Talkington / Kim Lepley vs Deanna Hibbard / Brittany Tarver4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesYana Morgan vs Tina Rickards-Fuller4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Marie Covington / Janet Guehl vs Mary Brandman / Jacqueline Ward1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Ann Talkington
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.22
Robyn Prince
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Mendy Melancon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.07
Christina Langford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.01
Deanna Young
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Juju Milam
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Yana Morgan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Janet Guehl
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Jodi Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Kim Lepley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.73
Ann Marie Covington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Jennifer Bekkers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Prince + Jennifer Bekkers4251% games−9.4% vs expected
Ann Talkington + Mendy Melancon4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Talkington
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Robyn Prince
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Mendy Melancon
11W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Christina Langford
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Deanna Young
17W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Juju Milam
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Yana Morgan
15W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Janet Guehl
22W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Jodi Pratt
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Kim Lepley
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Ann Marie Covington
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jennifer Bekkers
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.