Teams

Englert/18s/6.5/SC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

16 players · average NTRP 3.29 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Daysi Valencia
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.32
Christine Last
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Caroline France
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.16
Amanda McInnis
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
2.83
Amanda Myers
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
Caroline Allen
published 3
Courtney Ferger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Erin Englert
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kelly Slimming
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marie Luke
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Melisa Keo
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nikki Alls
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Lambou
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Suzanne Roy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Taylor Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tiffany Swoboda
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melisa Keo + Taylor Fernandez7260% gamesnot enough data
Marie Luke + Christine Last5454% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Myers + Caroline France5058% gamesnot enough data
Daysi Valencia + Kelly Slimming404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Englert + Amanda McInnis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daysi Valencia
55W–12L career · 34 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Christine Last
21W–12L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Caroline France
15W–13L career · 16 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amanda McInnis
18W–7L career · 13 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Amanda Myers
22W–14L career · 22 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Caroline Allen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Courtney Ferger
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Englert
26W–16L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
43W–34L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Luke
20W–12L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melisa Keo
19W–3L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Alls
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Lambou
2W–26L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Roy
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Fernandez
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Swoboda
20W–10L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.