Teams

Future Titans

2022 DC WTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · DC WTA Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.11 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-04vs 40 LOVELost 02
L#2 DoublesAisha Bhimla / Jeri Lyn Anderson vs Gianna Kang / Zahra Dawson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarion Dearth / Heidi Schriefer vs Tatiana Nogales / Lucrecia Ledesma1-6, 1-6
2022-05-21vs Serving LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Guo / Margaret Rubin vs Simone Feldman / Danette Williams6-4, 3-0
L#2 DoublesNazo Burgy / Cecilia Jones vs Mia Piansay / Lindsey Young6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHeidi Schriefer vs CJ Lin3-6, 1-6
2022-05-16vs GPSDCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAisha Bhimla / Margaret Rubin vs Trinh Banks / Martina Dragoytchev2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarion Dearth / Wendy Guo vs Erika Trost / Heather Carr3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHeidi Schriefer vs Elizabeth Vermillion0-6, 3-6
2022-05-14vs Strung OutLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarion Dearth / Wendy Guo vs Ally Stahl / Loretta Sevier1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCecilia Jones vs Michele Davis1-6, 0-4
L#2 DoublesAisha Bhimla / Heidi Schriefer vs Janine Lossing / Jennifer Simon2-6, 1-6
2022-05-07vs Lady TitansLost 12
L#1 SinglesCecilia Jones vs Stephanie Cohen6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarion Dearth / Wendy Guo vs Alice Ling / Roxana Schwenk6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeri Lyn Anderson / Cindy Mathys vs Aileen Jones / Elissa Lei2-6, 0-6
2022-04-24vs Strung OutSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Rubin / Marion Dearth vs Lora Bacanskas / Jennifer Duncan0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeri Lyn Anderson / Aisha Bhimla vs Jennifer Beets / Brenda Bosch3-6, 5-2
2022-04-23vs 40 LOVELost 13
L#1 SinglesWendy Guo vs Christen Harsha0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAisha Bhimla / Jeri Lyn Anderson vs Lucrecia Ledesma / Tatiana Nogales2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCecilia Jones vs Kristin Quackenbush3-6, 1-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Rubin / Marion Dearth vs Zahra Dawson / Yolanda Alexander1-3
2022-04-16vs Serving LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeri Lyn Anderson / Heidi Schriefer vs Gabriella Chen / Mallika Thomas4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCecilia Jones vs Duyen Nguyen1-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · DC WTA Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GPSDC9038716218
2Strung Out63281735276
3Lady Titans55272345347
4Future Titans0944180492

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Aisha Bhimla
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.13
Grace Becton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.89
Nazo Burgy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.79
Jeri Lyn Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Sunmin Kim
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Cecilia Jones
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.72
Marion Dearth
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.69
Cindy Mathys
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #1 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.68
Wendy Guo
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.62
Heidi Schriefer
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.57
Lisa Stock-Reusch
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.41
Margaret Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Rubin + Marion Dearth3227% games−6.8% vs expected
Marion Dearth + Wendy Guo2443% gamesnot enough data
Jeri Lyn Anderson + Heidi Schriefer1439% gamesnot enough data
Jeri Lyn Anderson + Cecilia Jones044 matchesnot enough data
Marion Dearth + Heidi Schriefer044 matchesnot enough data
Jeri Lyn Anderson + Aisha Bhimla123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Stock-Reusch + Cindy Mathys123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aisha Bhimla
26W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Grace Becton
148W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Nazo Burgy
116W–68L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
Jeri Lyn Anderson
5W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.79
4
Sunmin Kim
79W–66L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cecilia Jones
48W–52L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Marion Dearth
56W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Cindy Mathys
98W–103L career · 11 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Wendy Guo
7W–19L career · 9 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Heidi Schriefer
34W–78L career · 7 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Lisa Stock-Reusch
62W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Margaret Rubin
16W–30L career · 9 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.