Teams

Gugala/Pierenkemper/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Men - Sunday

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Dhingra/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric Kimmerling / Kohei Yamazaki vs Tim Wright / David Houlihan1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephan Pierenkemper / Nicholas Yglesias vs Hiroshi Goto / Luke Krehbiel6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJon Gugala / David Crews vs Hitesh Dhingra / TARUN JAIN2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-09vs Bordieri/NasvhilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlan Hale / David Crews vs Michael Bordieri / Rob Naylor6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephan Pierenkemper / Nicholas Yglesias vs Taylor Vandever / Jesse Harrison6-3, 6-0
2026-08-02vs Fisher/Holy/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlan Hale / Nicholas Yglesias vs Mike Montali / SEAN YANG6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Cole / Eric Kimmerling vs Sean Pomario / Anuragh Mudakatte6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJon Gugala / Aaron Farris vs Justin Holy / William Duhe6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men - Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Nicholas Yglesias
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Alan Hale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Jon Gugala
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Kohei Yamazaki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Eric Kimmerling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Michael Ellsworth
published
3.50
Stephan Pierenkemper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Aaron Farris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Matt Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Yglesias + Stephan Pierenkemper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Yglesias
30W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Alan Hale
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Jon Gugala
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Kohei Yamazaki
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Eric Kimmerling
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Michael Ellsworth
13W–4L career · no lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
Stephan Pierenkemper
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Aaron Farris
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Matt Cole
25W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.