Teams

NMAC.Friedman

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-10vs TOC.AroraSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAlejandra Monsalve vs Isabella Stubbs3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRupali Gautam vs Amy Mills7-6, 6-0
2026-08-03vs CAS.BelyeaLost 02
L#2 SinglesBrittany Rook vs Diana Fisch6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBrittany Friedman vs Kristi Holder0-6, 0-6
2026-07-15vs LOCH.AustinLost 12
W#1 SinglesRupali Gautam vs Tracey King6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrittany Friedman vs Laura Froseth2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLauren Leach vs Andrea Finucane4-6, 3-6
2026-06-30vs BENT.CorseWon 21
L#1 SinglesRupali Gautam vs Paula Laine3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAlejandra Monsalve vs Jordan Golden6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrittany Friedman vs Taylor Froehlich6-4, 6-0
2026-06-25vs TOC.SullivanSplit 11
W#2 SinglesBrittany Rook vs Rebecca Sullivan6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMacOn Hollister vs Julie Chriscoe0-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs MCP.CallawayWon 21
W#1 SinglesAlejandra Monsalve vs Laylani Callaway7-5, 6-0
L#2 SinglesBrittany Rook vs Megan Prieto3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLauren Leach vs Gail Gardner6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Iryna Piven
published 2.5
2.40
Alejandra Monsalve
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Rupali Gautam
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.23
Brittany Friedman
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Lauren Leach
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.15
Brittany Rook
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Hyunjin Jung
published 2.5
1.73
MacOn Hollister
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Friedman + Alejandra Monsalve123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Iryna Piven
4W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Alejandra Monsalve
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
Rupali Gautam
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Brittany Friedman
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Lauren Leach
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Brittany Rook
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Hyunjin Jung
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
MacOn Hollister
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.