Teams

WRAC-Blair

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-28vs YTC-DonahueLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Lacayo / Jennifer Carlson vs Corinne Choy / Judi Brown3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Patton / Leslie Blair vs Becky Melcher / Janet Owen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Linnell / Brenda Dunn vs Judi Harris / Lesley Kerns6-2, 7-6
2024-04-27vs EW-PFC-ClarkLost 03
L#1 DoublesJ Colleen Berry / Debra Lacayo vs Janice Leitner / Valaurie Caprez2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Carlson / Renee Patton vs Teesha Clark / Donna Parsons6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Blair / Julie Davenport vs Linda Solan / Dawn Gould4-6, 6-7
2024-04-27vs Park Fit GriffithWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebra Lacayo / Gracie Helm vs Lisa Marks / Lori Powers6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Davenport / Elizabeth Linnell vs Joy Griffith / Cindy Fenick6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJ Colleen Berry / Brenda Dunn vs Stefanie Button Walcott / Karen Cramer6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Debra Lacayo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Elizabeth Linnell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Jennifer Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Brenda Dunn
published
Gracie Helm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
J Colleen Berry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Blair
published
Renee Patton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Linnell + Jennifer Carlson4255% gamesnot enough data
Debra Lacayo + J Colleen Berry134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Davenport + Elizabeth Linnell213 matchesnot enough data
Debra Lacayo + Jennifer Carlson213 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Blair + Jennifer Carlson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debra Lacayo
28W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Elizabeth Linnell
41W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Jennifer Carlson
34W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.72
Brenda Dunn
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gracie Helm
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
J Colleen Berry
8W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Davenport
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Blair
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee Patton
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.