Teams

BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 40AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-02-21vs GREEN VALLEY CC 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesRuby Jane Kangleon / Elise D Harvey vs Maureen Dugoni / Lisa Varady6-1, 6-2
2022-02-19vs SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesElise D Harvey / Annabelle Marie vs Cynthia Oanes / Nancy Orellana6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Diana Babayan
published 3.5
3.23
Hazel Indick
published 3.5
3.21
Stacie Maa
published
3.20
Gloria Spencer
published 3.5
3.04
Lisa Burton
published
2.94
Elise D Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Cynthia Bazan
published 3
2.66
Annabelle Marie
published 3
2.57
Ruby Jane Kangleon
published
Michelle D Mcguire
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana Babayan
26W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Hazel Indick
19W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Stacie Maa
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gloria Spencer
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Lisa Burton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Elise D Harvey
71W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Cynthia Bazan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Annabelle Marie
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Ruby Jane Kangleon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.57
Michelle D Mcguire
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.