Teams

PC-Happy Hour

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-15vs YTC-McLeanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDon Donais / Joyce Donais vs Cynthia Kimel / Terry Kempton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Kirkham / Molly Kirkham vs Liberty McLean / Aaron Matthias1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRandy Gable / Midori Nyby vs Jody Snyder / Eric Rasmussen6-2, 6-2
2022-10-15vs PC-HolleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Kirkham / Molly Kirkham vs Lindy Bentley / Chad Dawson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoyce Donais / Don Donais vs Kristi Dawson / Adam Hrebeniuk7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Smith / Anthony Smith vs Dana Holle / Ken Holle6-1, 6-1
2022-10-14vs YTC-Kickin AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnthony Smith / Lisa Smith vs Kim Scacco-Morton / Monte Scacco6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDon Donais / Jadee Kirkham vs Audrey James / Jeffrey Vargas4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRandy Gable / Midori Nyby vs Jenifer Busey / Ken Borello4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesRandy Gable / Rebecca Allen vs Karl Lieberknecht / Molly Carlson6-4, 6-3
2021-05-01vs YTC-FranklinWon 10
W#3 DoublesRandy Gable / Lindy Bentley vs Brian Kegley / Michele Ladd6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Molly Kirkham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
James Kirkham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Anthony Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Don Donais
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Joyce Donais
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Midori Nyby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Jadee Kirkham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lisa Smith
published
Randy Gable
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Smith + Anthony Smith11174% games+19.2% vs expected
Joyce Donais + Don Donais21758% games+4.8% vs expected
James Kirkham + Jadee Kirkham10652% games−0.3% vs expected
Midori Nyby + Randy Gable5449% games−1.3% vs expected
Jadee Kirkham + Randy Gable033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Molly Kirkham
35W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
James Kirkham
53W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Anthony Smith
78W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Don Donais
104W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Joyce Donais
69W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Midori Nyby
55W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Jadee Kirkham
42W–62L career · 1 line in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Lisa Smith
33W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Randy Gable
70W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.