Teams

NOR-MAC-Kafi

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Ken Schwerd
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
4.02
Jim Fredericks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Robert Torch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Reza Kafi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.84
Alex Young
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.82
John Oh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Doug Post
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.81
Ben Merritt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Scott Lenker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
William Hergenhan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Chris Lowen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.63
Thomas Turnbull
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Ken Schwerd
66W–26L career
0%70%30%
4.05
4
Jim Fredericks
46W–9L career
0%72%28%
4.02
4
Robert Torch
61W–20L career
0%81%19%
3.99
4
Reza Kafi
50W–26L career
1%86%13%
3.90
4
Alex Young
42W–22L career
0%96%4%
3.84
4
John Oh
38W–10L career
1%96%4%
3.82
4
Doug Post
79W–40L career
0%98%1%
3.81
4
Ben Merritt
29W–32L career
1%96%3%
3.81
4
Scott Lenker
46W–24L career
1%97%3%
3.81
4
William Hergenhan
56W–42L career
8%91%1%
3.70
4
Chris Lowen
15W–16L career · type A
4%96%0%
3.68
4
Thomas Turnbull
86W–92L career
7%93%0%
3.63

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.