Teams

1-SStowe-SVC

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-07vs 5-NDolan-HRWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlison Moseley / Elischa Dessalines vs Tina Prinstein / Athena Samaras6-1, 6-1
2024-10-07vs 4-LDubois-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Correal / Christina Chenet vs Jonda Young / Annaliese Gresham2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-04vs 3-LKulp-EPHWon 20
W#2 DoublesErin McElligott / Elischa Dessalines vs Ashlyn Zebrowski / Stephanie Bailey6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarbara Correal / Haley Transou Terry vs Lori Salzmann / Ann Laros6-4, 6-4
2024-09-23vs 2-JFaubert-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Castiller / Sandra Stowe vs Kristin Cooley / Lindsay Mize0-6, 1-6
2024-09-09vs 6-DBaker-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesElischa Dessalines / Debbie Castiller vs Sara Knechtel / Gretchen LoFrese4-6, 4-6
2024-08-26vs 9-CGonzales-ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Correal / Laura Malahias vs Marklyn Kamara / Katie Helms6-1, 6-4
2024-08-12vs 8-ADavies-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesElischa Dessalines / Jennifer Magee vs Courtney Whilden / Adrian Davies3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-12vs 7-APerry-ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Correal / Haley Transou Terry vs Maria Behan / Colleen Starns6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Erin McElligott
published 3.5
3.12
Laura Caldwell
published
3.08
Debbie Castiller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.07
Laura Gallaher
published
3.05
Mary Griffiths
published
2.90
Barbara Correal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Alison Moseley
published 3
2.74
Elischa Dessalines
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Laura Malahias
published
Elizabeth Arnold
published 2.5
Melinda Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin McElligott + Melinda Wright4259% games+11.9% vs expected
Laura Caldwell + Erin McElligott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin McElligott
31W–20L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Laura Caldwell
43W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Debbie Castiller
189W–106L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
Laura Gallaher
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.07
Mary Griffiths
36W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Barbara Correal
27W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Alison Moseley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Elischa Dessalines
40W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Laura Malahias
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
2.5
Elizabeth Arnold
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Wright
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.