Teams

Ace of Hearts

2022 40&Over Mixed · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-10vs Roch: McDermottLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Savage / John Buscaglia vs JIM MCDERMOTT / Shelley Alfieri6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMonica Hodis / Jamie Syrett vs Beth McDermott / Mark Liu2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Sinclair Parker / Marco Gianni vs Debra Go / James Whalen5-7, 2-6
2022-08-08vs Roch: McDermottLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Reimer / Elle Johnson vs Pat Patterson / Kimberly Patterson4-6, 4-6
2022-08-04vs Roch: McDermottLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Savage / Robert Reimer vs Aaron Huber / Shelley Alfieri3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Hodis / Jamie Syrett vs Laraine Segar / Kevin Nowack2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStacia Barkstrom / Marco Gianni vs Mark Liu / Jennifer Karr1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-20vs Roch: McDermottLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Buscaglia / Kathleen Savage vs Aaron Huber / Shelley Alfieri4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarco Gianni / Jacqueline Sinclair Parker vs Laraine Segar / Kevin Nowack2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Weimer / Stacia Barkstrom vs Jennifer Karr / Mark Liu3-6, 0-6
2022-07-14vs Roch: McDermottSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathleen Savage / Mark Weimer vs Debra Go / Richard Libby5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Sinclair Parker / Robert Reimer vs Kimberly Patterson / Pat Patterson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roch: McDermott50132689
2Ace of Hearts0521328176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jamie Syrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Kathleen Savage
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Elle Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Sinclair Parker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Monica Hodis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Mark Weimer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marco Gianni
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Reimer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Hodis + Jamie Syrett0728% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Syrett
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Kathleen Savage
101W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Elle Johnson
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jacqueline Sinclair Parker
25W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monica Hodis
28W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Mark Weimer
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Marco Gianni
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Reimer
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.