← Teams

PTC-Kopack/Ossanna

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.85 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Elise Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.78
Kristen Kopack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Frank Mathews
published 4
3.72
Christy Strange
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Brad Ouderkirk
published 4
3.55
Chris Collins
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.55
Peter Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Leah Buxman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.10
Bryan Potter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Peter Singson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2019-12-14Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesKirsten Holmes / Bryan Potter vs Aaron Stout / Jinquan Wu6-2, 6-1
2019-11-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Kyle McGovern vs Susan Eldridge / Matt Bolte6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLarry Hermida / Elise Anderson vs Jeffrey Shafer / Sadhana Kapur6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Singson / Lisa Shantley vs Jolene Neal / Rich Rice6-3, 6-4
2019-11-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKristen Kopack / Chris Collins vs Sara Vanderhoff / Shane Kim6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBryan Potter / Kirsten Holmes vs Robert Kelly / Jennifer Stevenson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2019-11-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesChris Collins / Elise Anderson vs Kevin Jarvis / Sarah Ferrer6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesScott Pennington / Leah Buxman vs Tarynn Berkman / Anh Ngo6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristy Strange / Peter Johnson vs Megan McCarter / Duy Nguyen6-3, 6-4
2019-10-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Kyle McGovern vs Tami McAra / Douglas Walker6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeah Buxman / Scott Pennington vs Julie Trujillo / Ben Yamaguchi6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKirsten Holmes / Peter Johnson vs Michele Snyder / Warren Olsen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2019-10-11Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesScott Pennington / Leah Buxman vs Roger Dehoog / Elicia Putnam6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBryan Potter / Tonya Dirk vs Ken Pacioni / Lillian Lee6-2, 7-6
2019-10-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesElise Anderson / Kyle McGovern vs Jessica Khalili / Barzin Khalili6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Collins / Leah Buxman vs Elizabeth Domagalski / David Rabbino6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBryan Potter / Tonya Dirk vs Brad Hart / Michele Hart7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2019-09-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChris Collins / Christy Strange vs Sandi Martes / David Lomartire6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCourtney Storrs / Peter Johnson vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Paul Stutzman6-4, 6-2
2019-09-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesElise Anderson / Chris Collins vs Mary Marsh / Michael Leake6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Kopack / Larry Hermida vs Stephen Marsh / Julie Legassick6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKirsten Holmes / Peter Singson vs Natalia Joelson / David Aman6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Elise Anderson
84W–81L career · type A
47%53%0%
3.88
4
Kristen Kopack
70W–45L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Frank Mathews
34W–11L career
not enough data
—
4
Christy Strange
89W–67L career
1%98%0%
3.72
4
Brad Ouderkirk
70W–47L career
16%84%0%
3.58
4
Chris Collins
113W–56L career
24%76%0%
3.55
3.5
Peter Johnson
93W–53L career
0%70%30%
3.55
4
Leah Buxman
113W–106L career
23%77%0%
3.54
3
Bryan Potter
69W–39L career
0%52%48%
3.10
3.5
Peter Singson
88W–60L career
13%87%0%
3.10

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.