Teams

LATA18/Vogel/LCTC

2024 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 4.0 Adult Mixed Doubles

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-03vs LATA18/Zupon/CAMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesMegan Freiburger / Brandon Doty vs Kay Wescott / MARTIN CATOLICO6-2, 6-1
2024-05-13vs LATA18/Zupon/CAMPWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandon Doty / Amanda Willoughby vs Jim Wescott / Kacey Rugg3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Jessica Gore
published
3.99
Melissa Brightbill
published
3.95
Kevin Felkel
published
3.95
Lisa Hamrick
published
3.91
Timothy Hamrick
published
3.86
Emilee McLauchlin
published
3.85
Brandon Doty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Megan Freiburger
published
3.79
Ben Stitely
published 4
3.79
Ben Freiburger
published 4
3.77
Aaron Hilton
published 4
3.76
3.74
Loren Ryan
published
3.68
Miranda Heaberlin
published
3.63
Glen Funderburk
published
3.52
Nathan Sanders
published
3.48
Randi Vogel
published
Joshua Simons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Hamrick + Timothy Hamrick6160% games+7.9% vs expected
Amanda Willoughby + Ben Stitely224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Gore
65W–19L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Melissa Brightbill
95W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Kevin Felkel
79W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Lisa Hamrick
48W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
Timothy Hamrick
44W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.91
Emilee McLauchlin
48W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Brandon Doty
132W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Megan Freiburger
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Ben Stitely
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Ben Freiburger
30W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Aaron Hilton
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Amanda Willoughby
37W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Loren Ryan
105W–31L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Miranda Heaberlin
85W–29L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Glen Funderburk
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Nathan Sanders
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Randi Vogel
47W–21L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Joshua Simons
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.