Teams

Cheval Aces and Sevens - N. Martinez

2021 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-03-28vs Buckhorn Mixed BagWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarvin Jones / Angela Huber vs James Schneider / Claire Parker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Chris Chee-A-Tow / Erin Vickers6-2, 6-4
2021-02-14vs Hills - HCC Rip and Sip/DinhWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarvin Jones / Lorrie White vs David Voelker / Nelci Rodrigues7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2021-01-24vs HCC Spoilers - M. PalmerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarvin Jones / Lorrie White vs Roxanne Ross / Marcelino Velez6-1, 6-4
2021-01-17vs Hunters Green - S. HunterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarvin Jones / Lorrie White vs Stephen Hunter / Leslie Herrion6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAleksandar Seovic / Marija Seovic vs Nikki Spirakis / John Slatniske3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.64
Matthew Hayes
published
3.31
Marija Seovic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Jennifer Joyner
published
3.26
Luke Gatza
published
Aaron Poole
published 3.5
3.15
Lorrie White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Crow
published
3.07
Aleksandar Seovic
published 3.5
2.81
Angela Huber
published 3
Jason Crow
published
Marvin Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marvin Jones + Lorrie White303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Matthew Hayes
17W–23L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Marija Seovic
99W–72L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
Jennifer Joyner
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Luke Gatza
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Aaron Poole
0W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Lorrie White
184W–124L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lisa Crow
14W–17L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Aleksandar Seovic
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Angela Huber
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
Jason Crow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marvin Jones
24W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.