Teams

UPTA54FF/Kimbell/Thornblade

2026 UPTA Fall 54 & Over-Women · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA54FF/Kimbell/Thornblade000000
2UPTA54FF/Hughes/GCC000000
3UPTA54FF/Tougaw/KeoweeKey000000
4UPTA54FF/Lawson/Hollytree000000
5UPTA54FF/Golden/Brookstone000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Erin Byxbee
published 3
2.86
Carrie Dickert
published 3
2.85
Shelley Mckay
published
2.79
Karen Golden
published
2.72
2.71
Kelli Reinstein
published
2.20
Amy Kimbell
published 2.5
Nancy Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Kimbell + Kelli Reinstein7749% games+5.3% vs expected
Debbie Kiriakides + Karen Golden2353% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Dickert + Kelli Reinstein314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Kiriakides + Erin Byxbee123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Golden + Kelli Reinstein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Erin Byxbee
54W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Carrie Dickert
9W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Shelley Mckay
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Karen Golden
7W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Debbie Kiriakides
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Kelli Reinstein
27W–28L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Amy Kimbell
15W–36L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Nancy Robinson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.