Teams

C'MON!

2026 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-28vs Set2WinLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Peterson / Nicole Brizan vs Gay Trinkner / Khanh Le2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMeg Tronquet vs Amy Cahoon4-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesGrace Yost / Grace Kim vs Andrea Foster / Caitlin Bergo4-6, 2-4
2026-03-15vs Capital SMADLost 03
L#1 DoublesGiuliana Rabah / Cara Fulton vs Laura Jairam / Sueyun Hsieh4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSandra Peterson vs Mona Cedo1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Yost / Holly Erdely vs Suzanne Pitkin / Susan Velasco2-6, 2-6
2026-03-14vs Violet FemmesLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Levis / Nilam Patel vs Allison Meringoff / Lara Ramsey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeg Tronquet vs Kerri Thomas3-6, 3-3
W#2 DoublesNicole Brizan / Sandra Peterson vs Monica Popp / Brooke Potthast6-2, 6-2
2026-03-01vs Anderson & AndersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesRegina Farrington / Giuliana Rabah vs Donna Stewart / Victoria Rader6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMeg Tronquet vs Elena Molchanova3-6, 1-4
L#2 DoublesCara Fulton / Grace Kim vs SanYvette Williams / Sylvia Okala3-6, 3-4
2026-02-21vs Lady Noon BallersLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrace Kim / Sandra Peterson vs Nicole Ifill / Andrea Motley3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMeg Tronquet vs Amber Surmiller6-0, 5-3
L#2 DoublesGrace Yost / Tracy Ballard vs Hannah Yoo / Socheata Kim1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-08vs DC Tennis ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesGiuliana Rabah / Nilam Patel vs Sandy Horowitz / Tamara Davis6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSandra Peterson vs Whitney Paxson0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Levis / Tracy Ballard vs Brannon Matthews-Dickey / Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner6-2, 5-2
2026-02-07vs The NETworkWon 21
L#1 DoublesHolly Erdely / Regina Farrington vs Renu Schmoyer / Kristen Maddux4-6, 3-2
W#1 SinglesMeg Tronquet vs Lisa Schievelbein6-3, 5-4
W#2 DoublesGrace Kim / Sandra Peterson vs Kali Keller / Sara Tobin6-3, 4-2
2026-01-18vs Simply SmashingLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Brizan / Denise Levis vs Victoria Quint / Rosalie Hooper4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGrace Yost vs Yvette Fontenot2-6, 2-6
2026-01-11vs DC RacqueteersLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Ballard / Holly Erdely vs Sharon Cohen / Carina Villagra1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMeg Tronquet vs TingTing Du3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Peterson / Grace Kim vs Nikki Mills / Bella Bidzhieva4-6, 3-1, 1-0
2026-01-04vs Gut InstinctLost 12
L#1 DoublesCara Fulton / Nicole Brizan vs Mary Cepko / Lisa Steel4-6, 4-5
W#1 SinglesSandra Peterson vs Tracy Phillips6-3, 4-3
L#2 DoublesDenise Levis / Nilam Patel vs Kathleen McGrath / Tamara Clarke3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Giuliana Rabah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Nicole Brizan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Cara Fulton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Regina Farrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Levis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Tracy Ballard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Meg Tronquet
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Nilam Patel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Sandra Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.08
Holly Erdely
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Grace Yost
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Grace Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Peterson + Nicole Brizan5261% games+4.8% vs expected
Regina Farrington + Giuliana Rabah213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Giuliana Rabah
40W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Nicole Brizan
66W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Cara Fulton
156W–152L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Regina Farrington
179W–186L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Denise Levis
131W–88L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Tracy Ballard
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Meg Tronquet
63W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Nilam Patel
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sandra Peterson
35W–58L career · 8 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Holly Erdely
78W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Grace Yost
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Grace Kim
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.