Teams

White

2024 Tri Level · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-27vs Boun 2 LowLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Schroeder / Brody Perez vs Darin Allen / Caleb Ramirez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Walton / Matthew Huang vs Alen Huerta / Jose Perez1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlan Bean / Tyler Topper vs Keith Nishimura / J D Scott6-2, 6-1
2024-10-26vs Boun 1 LowLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Schroeder / Brody Perez vs Bounhieng Manhkong / Brad Swadling6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Walton / Matthew Huang vs Jeff Neely / Ethen Rattana6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTyler Topper / Alan Bean vs Shawn Riley / Joe Bryan Sanchez7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-26vs PachecoLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Schroeder / Brody Perez vs Tommy Ondara / Leonardo Martinez2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Bean / Tyler Topper vs Lap Hy / Brady W. Holmich2-6, 2-6
2024-10-06vs Boun 2 LowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Schroeder / Brody Perez vs Darin Allen / Caleb Ramirez1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTyler Topper / Richard Walton vs Keith Nishimura / J D Scott6-3, 6-3
2024-10-05vs PachecoLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Schroeder / Brody Perez vs Juan Pacheco / Leonardo Martinez2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Huang / Richard Walton vs Jesus Teposte / Ben Allen3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTyler Topper / Carlos Perez vs Brady W. Holmich / Lap Hy1-6, 4-6
2024-10-05vs Boun 1 LowLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Schroeder / Brody Perez vs Josh Weis / Ethen Rattana6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Huang / Carlos Perez vs Jeff Neely / Bounhieng Manhkong7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTyler Topper / Richard Walton vs Jason Hinchliffe / Shawn Riley6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brody Perez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Alan Bean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carlos Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Eric Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Walton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Tyler Topper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brody Perez + Eric Schroeder0637% games−3.8% vs expected
Tyler Topper + Alan Bean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brody Perez
1W–7L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Alan Bean
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Carlos Perez
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eric Schroeder
3W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Walton
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tyler Topper
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.