Teams

MCTL55/Barnett/RHTC

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed - 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-07-06vs MCTL55/Rawdon/RHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Harris / Jane Sickles vs JAMES SMITH / Cindi Helms6-3, 6-4
2023-05-25vs MCTL55/Bowers/RHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Harris / Jane Sickles vs Kelly Hancock / Rachael Schuler6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Mixed - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Rosie Rogers
published
3.71
Janet Baker
published
3.71
Jane Sickles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Nicole Morris
published
3.32
Madlen Barnett
published
Bill Rochester
published
Nelson Britt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosie Rogers
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.78
Janet Baker
37W–32L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jane Sickles
104W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Nicole Morris
22W–21L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.41
Madlen Barnett
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Bill Rochester
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nelson Britt
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.