Teams

Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.5 40 & Over Tues PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-20vs Hitchcock 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Chapman / Lee Picklesimer vs Mark Lapierre / Perry Smith5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaymond Rosario / Charles Calkins vs Kenny Winter / Brooks Jackson3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesZiad Fleihan / Neil Henderson vs Chris Hill / Amiel Rossabi4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-13vs Rutledge 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Shade / Johan Gedlitschka vs Brad Johnson / Andrew Hjelt7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Sawyer / Neil Henderson vs Andy Rutledge / Neal Dorman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChuck Burns / Michael Auger vs John Bradley / John Kim6-4, 6-0
2025-04-22vs Rutledge 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesZiad Fleihan / Michael Davis vs Brad Johnson / Andrew Hjelt6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCharles Calkins / Johan Gedlitschka vs Johan Nordmark / Jeff Fusaiotti4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Shade / Michael Auger vs John Bradley / John Kim6-3, 6-3
2025-04-01vs Rutledge 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Davis / Charlie Lambis vs Andy Rutledge / Brad Johnson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNeil Henderson / Matthew Menzi vs Andrew Hjelt / Christopher Crouch6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChuck Burns / Lee Picklesimer vs John Kim / John Bradley6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-11vs Rutledge 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesBryan Vescio / Chris Chapman vs Christopher Crouch / Andrew Hjelt6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlie Lambis / Rahim Ryan Khan vs Brad Johnson / Neal Dorman7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesZiad Fleihan / Michael Davis vs Mike Gell / John Bradley6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 40 & Over Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Chuck Burns
published 4.5
4.21
Bryan Vescio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Lee Picklesimer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Neil Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Michael Auger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Michael Shade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.08
Ziad Fleihan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Charlie Lambis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.70
Charles Calkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Johan Gedlitschka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jonathan Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Menzi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rahim Ryan Khan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Raymond Rosario
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlie Lambis + Bryan Vescio2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chuck Burns
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Bryan Vescio
37W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Lee Picklesimer
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.20
Neil Henderson
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
4.15
Michael Auger
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Michael Shade
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.10
Ziad Fleihan
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Charlie Lambis
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Charles Calkins
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Johan Gedlitschka
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Sawyer
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Menzi
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rahim Ryan Khan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Rosario
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.