Teams

DPagano (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-25vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDaniela Pagano / Donna Savage vs Janet Garvey / Barbara Northrup4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Morgan / Brenda Jandebeur vs Tamara Gallagher / Patti Moser3-6, 3-6
2023-09-24vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Sullivan-Keating / Sharon Roberts vs AMY SAFIR / Cheri King4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniela Pagano / Robin Estridge vs Sara Applegate / Cyndie Hobson2-6, 2-6
2023-09-19vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJanet Locke / Jill Sullivan-Keating vs Cheri King / Cyndie Hobson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Morgan / Brenda Jandebeur vs Patti Moser / Karen Foster0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-09-05vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Locke / Donna Savage vs Sara Applegate / Cyndie Hobson3-6, 3-6
2023-09-03vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniela Pagano / Donna Savage vs Sara Applegate / Karen Foster2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHilda Austin / Janet Locke vs Kelley Montroy / Janet Garvey6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Morgan / Brenda Jandebeur vs Cheri King / Tamara Gallagher2-6, 0-6
2023-08-22vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLynne Schachte / Hilda Austin vs Kelley Montroy / Janet Garvey6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Rosie Rogers
published
3.55
Janet Locke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Daniela Pagano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Lynne Schachte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Jill Sullivan-Keating
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Robin Estridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Donna Savage
published 3.5
3.13
Hilda Austin
published 3.5
3.04
Brenda Jandebeur
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniela Pagano + Janet Locke4354% games+2.0% vs expected
Robin Estridge + Janet Locke2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosie Rogers
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.78
4
Janet Locke
46W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Daniela Pagano
153W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Lynne Schachte
20W–37L career · 1 line in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Jill Sullivan-Keating
134W–69L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Robin Estridge
27W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Donna Savage
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Hilda Austin
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
3
Brenda Jandebeur
166W–220L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.04
Karen Morgan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.