Teams

LRDA-Dann/Westport 40+ 4.5

2024 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesLynn Chambers / Britt Ruby vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-29vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Chambers / Britt Ruby vs Kimberly Diaz / Diana West1-6, 5-7
2024-04-21vs LAMO-Morris/NMPWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynn Chambers / Britt Ruby vs Andreina Morris / Jane Sickles6-2, 6-1
2024-04-14vs LAMO-Morris/NMPWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynn Chambers / Britt Ruby vs Becky Tennyson / Darri Thayaprasat6-4, 6-4
2024-04-07vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 01
L#3 DoublesBritt Ruby / Lynn Chambers vs Fumiyo Ono / Kristen Montgomery3-6, 4-6
2024-03-24vs LAMO-Morris/NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynn Chambers / Renee Fleishman vs Andreina Morris / Fumiyo Ono6-4, 6-4
2024-03-10vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 01
L#1 DoublesBritt Ruby / Lynn Chambers vs Darri Thayaprasat / Becky Tennyson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Cheryl Woodruff
published 4.5
4.21
Elizabeth Berley
published
4.19
Britt Ruby
published 4.5
4.18
Jennifer Gardiner
published
4.09
Christine Richards
published 4.5
4.04
Robin Dann
published
4.04
Lynn Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.03
Kathleen Milligan
published
3.98
Renee Fleishman
published
3.98
Pamela Beecher
published
C E Swanson
published 4
3.75
Michelle Fontana
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Chambers + Britt Ruby5074% games+10.1% vs expected
Cheryl Woodruff + Robin Dann404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Gardiner + Pamela Beecher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheryl Woodruff
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
4.35
Elizabeth Berley
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Britt Ruby
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Jennifer Gardiner
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Christine Richards
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
4.09
Robin Dann
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4.5
Lynn Chambers
116W–77L career · 7 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
Kathleen Milligan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Renee Fleishman
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
Pamela Beecher
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
C E Swanson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Fontana
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.