Teams

Couch - PCC

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-17vs Holmes - RS HardLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Bellina / Brittany Durrani vs Susan Schellin / Candy Zuleger0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMarissa Couch vs Heather Harmon6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHoney Harris / Alex Messmore vs Tanya Young / ERIKA PHAN-LUNG1-6, 2-6
2025-06-06vs Holmes - RS HardLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Coggin / Kelly Bellina vs Margaret Menear / Wendy McIntosh Holmes0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Durrani vs Natalie Nguyen4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHoney Harris / Joy Huber vs Tanya Young / Jessica Isakson3-6, 3-6
2025-06-03vs DellaFera - RS HardLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Bellina / Valorie Williams vs Dakota DellaFera / Mary Benson1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrittany Durrani vs Michelle Loy1-6, 2-6
2025-05-13vs DellaFera - RS HardWon 20
W#1 DoublesHannah Coggin / Brittany Durrani vs Stephanie Hepler / Jessic Melton6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValorie Williams / Marissa Couch vs Janet Brennen / Connie Berdan6-3, 7-5
2025-04-29vs Escambia/Dudney/18&Over2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarissa Couch / Valorie Williams vs Victoria Grise / Vanessa Vey7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHannah Coggin vs Jennifer Washington0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Brittany Durrani
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.29
Hannah Coggin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Kelly Bellina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Valorie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Honey Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Joy Huber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marissa Couch
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Bellina + Brittany Durrani5173% games+33.5% vs expected
Hannah Coggin + Joy Huber033 matchesnot enough data
Valorie Williams + Kelly Bellina123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Brittany Durrani
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.59
2.5
Hannah Coggin
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Kelly Bellina
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.25
Valorie Williams
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Honey Harris
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Joy Huber
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marissa Couch
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.