Teams

Megan Corcoran-YTC-18+-3.0

2025 Auburn USTA Adult 18 & Over Spring League · 3.0 Adult Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-10vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesKristen Baker / Stephanie Rogers vs Grace Wright / Burkley Ayres6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica McDonald vs Rylee Lusich5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebekah Jenkins / Melissa Tran vs Annagail Holton / Madison Coleman6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Corcoran / Stephanie Olsen vs Carolyn Hudachek / Seonmi Yu6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Baker / Stephanie Rogers vs Annagail Holton / Burkley Ayres6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSara Caldwell / Julie McRae vs Griffin Allen / Sun Ah Jung4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Stephens / Stephanie Olsen vs Madison Coleman / Carrie Belsito1-6, 4-6
2025-04-03vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Corcoran / Catherine Williams vs Isabella Fiorenzo / Burkley Ayres6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMolly Killingsworth vs Griffin Allen6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Rogers / Jessica McDonald vs Charlotte Forrest / Seonmi Yu7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesRebekah Jenkins / Jennifer Stephens vs Burkley Ayres / Sun Ah Jung6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMolly Killingsworth vs Madison Coleman6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Caldwell / Hilary Joyce vs Carrie Belsito / Rylee Lusich4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Tran / Megan Corcoran vs Isabella Fiorenzo / Charlotte Forrest6-7, 4-6
2025-03-20vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJessica McDonald / Melissa Tran vs Caitlin FitzSimons / Grace Wright5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesRebekah Jenkins vs Paige Ellison-Smith6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSara Caldwell / Hilary Joyce vs Seonmi Yu / Sun Ah Jung2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Olsen / Julie McRae vs Burkley Ayres / Isabella Fiorenzo4-6, 1-6
2025-03-06vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRebekah Jenkins / Megan Corcoran vs Grace Wright / Caitlin FitzSimons5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Baker / Jessica McDonald vs Annagail Holton / Carrie Belsito3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Tran / Stephanie Olsen vs Seonmi Yu / Sun Ah Jung1-6, 5-7
2025-02-27vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-3.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rogers / Jennifer Stephens vs Carolyn Hudachek / Sun Ah Jung6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMolly Killingsworth vs Rylee Lusich6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelissa Tran / Stephanie Olsen vs Annagail Holton / Grace Wright3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHilary Joyce / Sara Caldwell vs Carrie Belsito / Isabella Fiorenzo6-4, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Molly Killingsworth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Catherine Williams
published 3.5
2.69
Stephanie Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.28
Hilary Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Jessica McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.23
Stephanie Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.21
Sara Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.18
Megan Corcoran
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Stephens
published
Julie McRae
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kristen Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rebekah Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vertrina Grubbs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Caldwell + Hilary Joyce5848% games+7.2% vs expected
Jessica McDonald + Stephanie Rogers404 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Olsen + Megan Corcoran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Killingsworth
52W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Catherine Williams
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Stephanie Rogers
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.69
Hilary Joyce
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Jessica McDonald
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Stephanie Olsen
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Sara Caldwell
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Megan Corcoran
10W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jennifer Stephens
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie McRae
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Baker
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebekah Jenkins
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vertrina Grubbs
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.