Teams

Crooked Creek (Melissa Holman)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel)

19 players · average NTRP 3.81 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Megan Melchiors
published
3.91
Beth Duggan
published 4
3.86
Lauren Lummus
published
3.82
Amy Paul
published 4
Brittany McCall
published 4
3.73
Nicole Koviak
published
3.68
Emily Harrell
published
3.66
Celia Kramer
published 3.5
3.65
Lauren Brougher
published
3.60
Joelle Corcoran
published
3.59
Crystel Patrick
published 4
3.56
Chanda Edmisten
published 4
3.56
Erin VanderMeer
published
3.42
Kim Plaziak
published
3.39
Mimi Madrid
published
Angela Greene
published 3.5
Ashley Rempfer
published 3.5
3.23
Melissa Holman
published
Kathryn Bohr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Holman + Kathryn Bohr314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Plaziak + Joelle Corcoran224 matchesnot enough data
Emily Harrell + Melissa Holman123 matchesnot enough data
Crystel Patrick + Chanda Edmisten123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Paul + Megan Melchiors123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Melchiors
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Beth Duggan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Lauren Lummus
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Amy Paul
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Brittany McCall
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Koviak
30W–19L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Emily Harrell
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Celia Kramer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
Lauren Brougher
16W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
Joelle Corcoran
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Crystel Patrick
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Chanda Edmisten
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Erin VanderMeer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Kim Plaziak
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
Mimi Madrid
24W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Angela Greene
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ashley Rempfer
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Holman
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
Kathryn Bohr
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.