Teams

FTA50S/Riverside/Clator

FTA SINGLES 50 & OVER - Sunday · 3.5 Women 50s

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 50s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Edie Clator
published
3.35
Liz Darrow
published
3.19
Justine Allen
published
3.05
Carol McCoy
published 3.5
2.77
Kim Dailey
published
2.65
Christina Pompey
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justine Allen + Edie Clator7354% games−6.3% vs expected
Liz Darrow + Edie Clator3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edie Clator
42W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Liz Darrow
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Justine Allen
26W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol McCoy
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Kim Dailey
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Christina Pompey
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.