Teams

Toleu: 4.0Ever Young

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Cathy Paper
published 4
3.82
Janice Ring
published
3.81
Kara Kreutzer
published
3.81
Michelle Finley
published
3.73
Lana Pinnock
published
3.72
Katie Pargal
published
3.71
Shae Rohling
published
3.65
Victoria Krauss
published
3.60
Mia Robillos
published
3.59
Susan Hommeyer
published
3.58
Mary Holst
published
3.56
Suzy Griffith
published
3.53
Barbara Brill
published 4
3.52
Pamela van Ert
published
3.51
Katie Hammond
published
3.47
Sarah Curfman
published
Allie Witte
published 3.5
Karla Toleu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Kreutzer + Sarah Curfman3454% games+9.5% vs expected
Janice Ring + Suzy Griffith141549% games+3.1% vs expected
Barbara Brill + Michelle Finley1840% games−7.3% vs expected
Pamela van Ert + Katie Pargal1443% games−9.3% vs expected
Karla Toleu + Katie Pargal1439% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Brill + Pamela van Ert033 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Paper + Susan Hommeyer213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Paper + Shae Rohling033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Paper
45W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Janice Ring
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
Kara Kreutzer
36W–43L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Michelle Finley
36W–50L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Lana Pinnock
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Katie Pargal
27W–34L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Shae Rohling
35W–33L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
Victoria Krauss
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Mia Robillos
40W–39L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
Susan Hommeyer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Mary Holst
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Suzy Griffith
17W–20L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Barbara Brill
9W–54L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Pamela van Ert
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Katie Hammond
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Sarah Curfman
58W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Allie Witte
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karla Toleu
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.