Teams

WNCM Silver (Aston Park)

NC Singles League 18 & Over WNC 2026 · 18+ Singles Women 3.5 - Thurs PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-27vs WNCM Goskowicz (ARC South)Split 11
W#1 SinglesAmy Marshall vs Christine Carson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMeredith Silver vs Maki Goskowicz2-6, 3-6
2026-08-22vs WNCK Gutschenritter (Aston Park)Won 20
W#1 SinglesEva Tune vs Katherine Gutschenritter6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMeredith Silver vs Margaret Knight7-5, 6-1
2026-08-14vs WNCJ Jackson (ARC South)Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Marshall vs Jenni Trimble6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-06vs WNCL Harrell (BFCC)Split 11
L#2 SinglesAmy Marshall vs Elizabeth Gerding6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMichelle Pugliese vs Amelia McCormick6-1, 6-0
2026-07-27vs WNCL Harrell (BFCC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesMeredith Silver vs Lydia Harrell6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMichelle Pugliese vs Susie Heinitsh6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesEva Tune vs Elizabeth Gerding6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-18vs WNCK Gutschenritter (Aston Park)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMary Cooper vs Allison McCartney4-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs WNCC Anders (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesEva Tune vs Shepard O'Connell6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMary Cooper vs Kelly Gillis2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMichelle Pugliese vs Alice Chen2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 18+ Singles Women 3.5 - Thurs PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCC Anders (ARC South)60162589
2WNCM Silver (Aston Park)419615106
3WNCJ Jackson (ARC South)34111023163
4WNCL Harrell (BFCC)2471126177
5WNCM Goskowicz (ARC South)134816115
6WNCK Gutschenritter (Aston Park)0411122139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Eva Tune
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.24
Meredith Silver
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.24
Amy Marshall
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Michelle Pugliese
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Mary Cooper
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eva Tune
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.52
Meredith Silver
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amy Marshall
4W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Michelle Pugliese
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Cooper
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.