Teams

SDNC WD LLW 4.5 Jingle Ballers @BT/ Sullivan

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC WD Women's Holiday · SDNC - Women- 4.5 (Mon

15 players · average NTRP 4.62 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 4.5 (Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Bettina Olah
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.56
Shelby Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.45
Loretta Warren
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Allison Sterett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Kristie Alva
published 5
4.40
Tiffany Kellogg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.39
Brianna Sullivan
published 4.5
4.39
Prentiss van Den Berg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Mary Malhame
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.29
Shelley Goodson
published
4.27
Laura Steenstra
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
4.18
Adele Psyllos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Diane Ghiron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Lisa Menante
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kellogg + Kristie Alva6254% games+7.9% vs expected
Tiffany Kellogg + Allison Sterett241056% games+2.8% vs expected
Mary Malhame + Diane Ghiron151055% games−0.5% vs expected
Prentiss van Den Berg + Mary Malhame3348% gamesnot enough data
Laura Steenstra + Shelby Rubin4256% gamesnot enough data
Prentiss van Den Berg + Brianna Sullivan5081% gamesnot enough data
Prentiss van Den Berg + Loretta Warren224 matchesnot enough data
Loretta Warren + Mary Malhame303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bettina Olah
67W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.61
5
Shelby Rubin
127W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.56
4.5
Loretta Warren
130W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Allison Sterett
123W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.42
5
Kristie Alva
60W–26L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
4.42
4.5
Tiffany Kellogg
163W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Brianna Sullivan
12W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Prentiss van Den Berg
82W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Mary Malhame
48W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
Shelley Goodson
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Laura Steenstra
168W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Fabiana Ibanez-Dieguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Adele Psyllos
83W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Diane Ghiron
100W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Lisa Menante
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.