← Teams

Le.Barter18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-25vs Er.Wynia18CLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesCourtney Carey / Barbara Wilhelm vs Jamie McCallum / Megan Havel6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-18vs Ki.Durland/Brown18CWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesLeigh Barter / Kyleigh Dunn vs Sarah Stevenson / Lowry Liggon6-3, 6-0
2023-09-11vs Li.Kempf18CWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesKara Horton / Silpa Yalamanchili vs Lauren Triebert / Betsy Fulcher6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeigh Barter / Lauren Redmond vs Marina Barthalmus / Myra Peterson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCourtney Carey / Kyleigh Dunn vs Ashley Walker / Lindsey Petrick6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-28vs St.Moritz18CSplit 1–1
W#1 DoublesLeigh Barter / Kyleigh Dunn vs Leslie Wright / Kimberlei Gill6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney Carey / Barbara Wilhelm vs Rebekah Mcconnell / Rachel Bricker3-6, 5-7
2023-08-21vs Be.Robertson18CWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesLeigh Barter / Amy Hobbs vs Susan Haughney / Christine Peterson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebekah Sedaca / Silpa Yalamanchili vs Anne Mueller / Jessica Grossano7-5, 6-4
2023-08-12vs Je.Anderson18C6.5Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Barter / Rebecca Fisher vs Alison Kalinowski / LaDonna Lee6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Leigh Barter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Kara Horton
published —
3.54
Amy Hobbs
published 3.5
3.26
Lauren Redmond
published —
3.04
Silpa Yalamanchili
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Barbara Wilhelm
published 3
2.88
Kyleigh Dunn
published —
2.72
Courtney Carey
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Redmond + Amy Hobbs3–14 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
—
Kara Horton
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Amy Hobbs
55W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
—
Lauren Redmond
31W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Silpa Yalamanchili
80W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Barbara Wilhelm
55W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
—
Kyleigh Dunn
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Courtney Carey
188W–154L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.