Teams

USTA-Jorda Hot Shots

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall - DAY · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-06vs Maitland Tennis Club@WP-FranksWon 20
W#2 DoublesElly Phoebus / Andrea Madriz vs Jamie Hage / Sandy Franks6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKelli Alexander / Kiera Phoebus vs Michele Marin / Kristin Osorio3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-22vs WPRC-VillagomezWon 20
W#1 SinglesPatricia Colloca Massot vs Carri Tisdell6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichelle Lopez / Kiera Phoebus vs Nicole Carter / Jennifer Kirchner6-0, 6-0
2024-11-08vs Lake Cane-Kender/PhanLost 02
L#1 SinglesPatricia Colloca Massot vs Haley Nott6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKiera Phoebus / Zheide Dacpano vs ROSANA MONTEIRO / Stacey Brack4-6, 2-6
2024-11-01vs Lake Cane-ChapmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesKiera Phoebus / LaTonya Jimenez vs Jayme Fairhurst / Nicole Prihoda6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesElly Phoebus vs Monica Santamaria6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKiera Phoebus / LaTonya Jimenez vs Eileen Gibson / Karen Oliver6-0, 6-0
2024-10-21vs Maitland- CooperSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaria Nunez / Janeane Vinson vs Meagan Matheny / Caitlin Yarbrough1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKiera Phoebus / Michelle Lopez vs Ashley Cooper / Courtney Maloney6-4, 6-3
2024-10-18Won 10
W#2 SinglesJaneane Vinson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesPatricia Colloca Massot vs Amy Jackson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Madriz / Elly Phoebus vs Shelley Sprague / Ning Xu6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Maria Nunez
published
3.20
Kiera Phoebus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.12
Patricia Colloca Massot
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.12
Laura Kutryb
published
3.11
Laura Nemes
published
3.11
Valentina Naumenko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Michelle Lopez
published
3.01
Andrea Madriz
published 3
2.97
Janeane Vinson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Lana Lyubimova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Marcela Bernardinez
published
2.80
Sandra Rodriguez
published
2.79
Elly Phoebus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.78
Kelli Alexander
published
Vickie Jorda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Madriz + Elly Phoebus5167% games+7.6% vs expected
Janeane Vinson + Patricia Colloca Massot20761% games+0.8% vs expected
Elly Phoebus + Kiera Phoebus7756% gamesnot enough data
Valentina Naumenko + Lana Lyubimova404 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Alexander + Kiera Phoebus303 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Rodriguez + Maria Nunez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Nunez
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
3
Kiera Phoebus
70W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
Patricia Colloca Massot
101W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.12
Laura Kutryb
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
Laura Nemes
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
Valentina Naumenko
26W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
Michelle Lopez
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.09
3
Andrea Madriz
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Janeane Vinson
86W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Lana Lyubimova
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.96
Marcela Bernardinez
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Sandra Rodriguez
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Elly Phoebus
77W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Kelli Alexander
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Vickie Jorda
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.