Teams

Kiss Our Passes

Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Women Central

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-16vs Nassau Simply SmashingLost 04
L#1 DoublesDenise Sena / Claudia Smith vs Kristen Striano / Victoria Reznik6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDana Ramos-Rivera vs Jennifer Strashinsky1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Jolin / Tatiana Zohar vs Marie Carusone / Maria Maldacena0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristine O'Shaughnessy / Valeria Kulynych vs Kristi Briones / Millie Chandler0-6, 3-6
2026-06-09vs SPRING CENTRAL/Ace AngelsLost 04
L#1 DoublesValeria Kulynych / Xiaomei Dai vs Penni Sander / Tong Zhang2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDana Ramos-Rivera vs Marie Collazo1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRong Nie / Beverly Harris vs Theresa Sauta / Anne Sugrue2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Borda / Gwen Wills vs Laura Brasher / Grace Davitt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-02vs Straight SetsLost 04
L#1 DoublesJill Jolin / Patricia Sanson vs Yoojung Co / Julia Portnoy4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDenise Sena vs Andrea Egan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Sarafudinov / Tatiana Zohar vs Kerri Marikakis / Jodi Alvater0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRong Nie / Xiaomei Dai vs Jean Boyd / Jennifer Giblin1-6, 6-7
2026-05-26vs Nassau Simply SmashingLost 13
L#1 DoublesDenise Sena / Gwen Wills vs Analia Erickson / Jennifer Strashinsky1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDana Ramos-Rivera vs Millie Chandler7-5, 2-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClaudia Smith / Tatiana Zohar vs Maureen Ruckelshaus / Kristi Briones3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Sarafudinov / Christine O'Shaughnessy vs Tracey Wijesinghe / Elisa Cohen6-4, 6-2
2026-05-19vs SPRING CENTRAL/Ace AngelsLost 13
L#1 DoublesClaudia Smith / Christine O'Shaughnessy vs Helen Milner / Pamela Calaquian1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDana Ramos-Rivera vs Yuming Zhao2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Jolin / Patricia Sanson vs Helen Geary / Tong Zhang6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeverly Harris / Denise Sena vs Sunyoung Kim / Laura Brasher6-4, 6-4
2026-05-12vs Straight SetsLost 04
L#1 DoublesDenise Sena / Patricia Sanson vs Rachel Wescoe / Kerri Marikakis0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesXiaomei Dai vs Katie Grennan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Borda / Rong Nie vs Sharon Becker / Kimberly Lowney3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Sarafudinov / Valeria Kulynych vs Julia Portnoy / Andrea Egan0-6, 4-6
2026-05-05vs Nassau Simply SmashingLost 04
L#1 DoublesGwen Wills / Christine O'Shaughnessy vs Jennifer Strashinsky / Analia Erickson0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDana Ramos-Rivera vs Millie Chandler3-6, 5-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTatiana Zohar / Claudia Smith vs Christine Petrane / Michelle Prager1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesValeria Kulynych / Jill Jolin vs ALLISON CASSESE / Lee Ann Martin4-6, 2-6
2026-04-28vs SPRING CENTRAL/Ace AngelsLost 04
L#1 DoublesCynthia Borda / Gwen Wills vs Helen Milner / Laura Brasher4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesXiaomei Dai vs Megan Kim3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Jolin / Patricia Sanson vs Christine Mc Afee / Sarah Lin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesValeria Kulynych / Helen Sarafudinov vs Jean Zhang / Andrea Chu1-6, 3-6
2026-04-21vs Straight SetsLost 04
L#1 DoublesChristine O'Shaughnessy / Xiaomei Dai vs Jacqueline Luthman / Arathi Reddy0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDana Ramos-Rivera vs Yoojung Co3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Borda / Gwen Wills vs Sharon Becker / Katie Grennan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRong Nie / Claudia Smith vs Navyata Sarkar / Julia Portnoy2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Central have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Dana Ramos-Rivera
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Xiaomei Dai
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.12
Gwen Wills
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Denise Sena
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Beverly Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Rong Nie
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.91
Christine O'Shaughnessy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Jill Jolin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Patricia Sanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Tatiana Zohar
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Claudia Smith
published 3
2.73
Helen Sarafudinov
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Cynthia Borda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Valeria Kulynych
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Sarafudinov + Valeria Kulynych131850% games+2.8% vs expected
Jill Jolin + Patricia Sanson0534% games−1.8% vs expected
Cynthia Borda + Gwen Wills7512845% games−1.8% vs expected
Tatiana Zohar + Valeria Kulynych384549% games−1.9% vs expected
Rong Nie + Beverly Harris5247% games−1.9% vs expected
Helen Sarafudinov + Tatiana Zohar3639% games−5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Ramos-Rivera
129W–169L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Xiaomei Dai
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Gwen Wills
96W–150L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Denise Sena
1W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Beverly Harris
71W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Rong Nie
124W–216L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3.5
Christine O'Shaughnessy
10W–17L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
Jill Jolin
12W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
Patricia Sanson
8W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Tatiana Zohar
125W–136L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Claudia Smith
7W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Helen Sarafudinov
102W–192L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cynthia Borda
89W–163L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Valeria Kulynych
145W–168L career · 8 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.