Teams

GSTL55/Waybright/Wachesaw

2026 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-14vs GSTL55/Bridgeman/RLTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesGenie Matthews / Whitney Hewitt vs Karen Bellamy / Patti Bridgeman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Singleton / Gwen Murray vs Barbara Meyer / LouAnne Valleri6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeanna Waybright / Marcia Nichols vs Cheryl Young / Jayne Spencer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-07vs GSTL 3.5W 55 & Over (Singleton)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGenie Matthews / Whitney Hewitt vs Dipti Paudel / Katie Sandoz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Singleton / Gwen Murray vs Reaves Langdale / Tracy Davenport6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDeanna Waybright / Jeanne Mize vs Susan Brady / Shai Kahn5-7, 6-7
2026-02-28vs GSTL55/Swartling/Grand DunesLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Singleton / Genie Matthews vs Debbie Michnowicz / Mesanie Lee3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Waybright / Nancy Algire vs Karen Swartling / Leslie Thomas3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGayeAnne Tanner / Marcia Nichols vs Diana Morgan / Barbara Glass2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Whitney Hewitt
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Michele Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Deanna Waybright
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Gwen Murray
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Genie Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.89
Jeanne Mize
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Nancy Algire
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
GayeAnne Tanner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marcia Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Saber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genie Matthews + Whitney Hewitt5258% games+15.6% vs expected
Michele Singleton + Gwen Murray6453% games+6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Hewitt
14W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Michele Singleton
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3.5
Deanna Waybright
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Gwen Murray
18W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Genie Matthews
12W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Jeanne Mize
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Nancy Algire
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
GayeAnne Tanner
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Marcia Nichols
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Saber
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.