Teams

Canon - Mazarick

2025 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 4.5 Adult Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-12vs 18+ 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Trebuhov / Benjamin Fortich vs Brian Gibson / William Clark6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesOwen McGrew vs Spencer Llewellyn6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJonathan Canon vs Matthew Hanauer6-4, 6-4
2025-04-05vs 18+ 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesParv Mital / Wes Watson vs Visakan Jayakumar / Spencer Llewellyn6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJonathan Canon vs Brian Gibson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRonald Orban / Benjamin Fortich vs Maxwell Gregson / Tyler Carroll7-6, 6-3
2025-03-29vs 18+ 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJonathan Canon / Brad Burgess vs Brian Gibson / William Clark6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWes Watson / Parv Mital vs Spencer Llewellyn / Visakan Jayakumar4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs 18+ 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrad Burgess / Benjamin Fortich vs William Clark / Brian Gibson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesOwen McGrew vs Matthew Hanauer6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Ronald Orban
published
4.50
Dave Welch
published 5
4.46
Owen McGrew
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.46
Parv Mital
published
4.44
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.34
Rawle Sue-Ho
published
4.31
Sean Hammer
published
4.29
Jonathan Canon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Wes Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Robby Taylor
published
3.96
Benjamin Fortich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Michael Trebuhov
published
Steve Musgrove
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Canon + Wes Watson2448% gamesnot enough data
Benjamin Fortich + Jonathan Canon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ronald Orban
108W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.53
5
Dave Welch
35W–22L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Owen McGrew
87W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
4.46
Parv Mital
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
Rawle Sue-Ho
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
Sean Hammer
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Jonathan Canon
102W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Wes Watson
154W–128L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Robby Taylor
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.07
4
Benjamin Fortich
75W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Michael Trebuhov
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Musgrove
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.