Teams

Varner/Davis 55+ 6.5

2022 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Betty Kramer
published 3.5
3.32
Martha Fogleman
published
3.31
Linda Hestenes
published
3.26
Niddy Corrias
published
3.18
Sue Blanchard
published
3.07
Dawn Frank
published 3.5
2.96
Maria Mandaleris
published
2.92
Rhonda Glenn
published
2.86
Brenda Varner
published 3
2.81
Donna Davis
published 3
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published 3
2.77
Lora Snyder
published
2.73
Jennifer M Riley
published
Lisa Liringis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Davis + Jennifer M Riley3256% gamesnot enough data
Martha Fogleman + Lisa Liringis213 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Varner + Lora Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Glenn + Sue Blanchard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betty Kramer
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Niddy Corrias
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Sue Blanchard
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Dawn Frank
13W–33L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
Maria Mandaleris
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Rhonda Glenn
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Brenda Varner
138W–88L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Donna Davis
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Faye Halvorsen
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Lora Snyder
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Jennifer M Riley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Lisa Liringis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.