Teams

The Club at Cheval - D. Agnew

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-31vs PC Overserved Green Team - S. BraySplit 11
L#1 DoublesPetti Waggoner / Cindy Bansky vs Kristen Wulbern / Susanna Bray4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Elizabeth Heitner vs Candace Evans / Andrea Lundy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesPetti Waggoner / Kimberly Shafer vs Alexis Schulman / Lisa Reins6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Warren vs Gia Marinelli5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Kay / Krystal Adrian vs Elena Leonov / Jennifer Hoecker6-4, 6-2
2025-10-17vs TYCC Party at the Net - M. JamesLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Bansky / Dhara Patel vs Sarah Boe / Kelley Sadlowski3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Warren vs Amanda Winn7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Weber / Elizabeth Heitner vs Sarah Lindbeck / Belem Schmidt5-7, 0-6
2025-10-10vs Avila Aces - I. PetersonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Weber / Dawn Kay vs Gail Wilson / Monica Illas1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKimberly Shafer vs Lina Dey2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPetti Waggoner / Maggie Lichtman vs Tara O'Grady / ALEXANDRA JENKINS6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-03vs VDF String Queens - B. KissellLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Weber / LAURA Martin Santana vs Letitia Morrison / Vanvisa Cheung6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDhara Patel vs Brittany Kissell2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Dietz / Diana Castellanos vs Dorimar Siverio-Minardi / Helena Taranoff2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDawn Kay / LAURA Martin Santana vs Devon Connell / Jennifer Wittenbauer6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Castellanos / Petti Waggoner vs Meltem SENTURK / Stacy Leatherman6-2, 6-2
2025-09-19vs CCC Champs - R. PullaroLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Dietz / Petti Waggoner vs Becky Kuntz / Dru Albano2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Shafer vs Marlene sokol7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Cindy Bansky vs Claudia Chao / Claire Ake6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-12vs HILLS/JangLost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Kay / Maggie Lichtman vs Karan Orbegoso / Erika Montanez3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDhara Patel vs Pojjamarn Simos3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Heitner / Cindy Bansky vs Sonia Cecilia Slaven / Angie Shin0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Denise Agnew
published 4.5
2.91
Elizabeth Heitner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Heather Warren
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.38
Katie Dietz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Dhara Patel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Kimberly Shafer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
LAURA Martin Santana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Maggie Lichtman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.14
Petti Waggoner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.14
Diana Castellanos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Dawn Kay
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.06
Krystal Adrian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.90
Cindy Bansky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.83
Linda Weber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Lichtman + Petti Waggoner3350% games+0.4% vs expected
Petti Waggoner + Katie Dietz213 matchesnot enough data
LAURA Martin Santana + Dhara Patel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Denise Agnew
97W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Elizabeth Heitner
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Heather Warren
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Katie Dietz
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Dhara Patel
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Kimberly Shafer
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
LAURA Martin Santana
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Maggie Lichtman
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Petti Waggoner
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Diana Castellanos
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Dawn Kay
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Krystal Adrian
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Cindy Bansky
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Linda Weber
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.