Teams

1-SGraff-Eno 5.5

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-27vs 10-LBible-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesPolly Hilsabeck / Cecilia Gonzales vs Kristin Cooley / Pamela Howell-Davis2-6, 1-6
2023-09-20vs 5-KGreen-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Ryan / Cecilia Gonzales vs Taiqin Huang / Alison Sinclair1-6, 0-6
2023-09-15vs 9-NWatts-Eno 5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Neeley / Jennifer Dunlap vs Jenna Harmon / Yvonne Ricci6-1, 6-0
2023-09-11vs 4-DBaker-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesKrissy Dunn / Alison Neeley vs Janet Ranheim / Debbie Baker4-1
L#3 DoublesAreli Grodski / Elizabeth Garg vs Diane Allen / Alexa Hartenstein2-6, 2-6
2023-08-23vs 8-MLong-Eno 5.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesPolly Hilsabeck / Areli Grodski vs Mary T Long / Jennifer Edmunds2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCristina Salvador / Cecilia Gonzales vs Angela Nesius / Isabella Goetting6-4, 6-2
2023-08-16vs 3-ADavies/TDavies-CHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKorinne Fuller / Cecilia Gonzales vs Adrian Davies / Jennifer Braby7-6
W#3 DoublesAreli Grodski / Elizabeth Garg vs Tracy Davies / Julie Myers6-0, 7-5
2023-08-11vs 7-LDubois-ENO 5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Goll / Cecilia Gonzales vs Kristin Isaacs / Laura Dubois1-6, 6-7
2023-08-02vs 2-JDeConto-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesPolly Hilsabeck / Areli Grodski vs Santae Cooper / Chelsea Donahue4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Neeley / Jennifer Dunlap vs Beth Dingler / Angela Combs3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Jennifer Dunlap
published
2.94
Susan Graff
published
2.86
Kim Goll
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Elizabeth Garg
published
2.70
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Polly Hilsabeck
published
2.60
Krissy Dunn
published
2.55
Areli Grodski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.55
Alison Neeley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Neeley + Cecilia Gonzales123 matchesnot enough data
Alison Neeley + Kim Goll213 matchesnot enough data
Alison Neeley + Areli Grodski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Dunlap
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
Susan Graff
27W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Kim Goll
132W–134L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
Elizabeth Garg
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Polly Hilsabeck
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Krissy Dunn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Areli Grodski
45W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%35%65%
2.55
3
Alison Neeley
44W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.