Teams

Parfitt/LR/CCLR

2026 Mixed 18 & Over 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-22vs Sisoukrath/Benton/RebsLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Carter / Sam Carter vs Amy Lane / JP Wade2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Parfitt / Dan Parfitt vs Sarah Sisco / Johnathan Armstrong1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Prince / Jonathan Parkey vs MacKenzie Bradshaw / Bradley Heird1-6, 1-6
2026-07-20vs Shepherd/Worley/LR/RebWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Prince / Jonathan Parkey vs Allison Baker / Dean Worley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-07vs Brown/Craft/LR/RebsLost 02
L#2 DoublesJonathan Parkey / Melanie Prince vs Lesly Jean-Francois / Mary Thalheimer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEliza Gaines / Sam Carter vs Randy Rankin / Dorian Craft0-6, 0-6
2026-06-29vs Glenn/Glenn/Maumelle/BPLost 02
L#2 DoublesDan Parfitt / Whitney Parfitt vs Kevin Golden / Sonjia Loftis4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaeghan Overley / Sam Overley vs Matthew Nelsen / Tiffany Garretson1-6, 1-6
2026-06-25vs Brown/Craft/LR/RebsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonathan Parkey / Melanie Prince vs Dorian Craft / Chris Halket6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHannah Rabinowitz / Justin Rabinowitz vs Jared Compton / Kharyssa Brown3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaeghan Overley / Sam Overley vs Kara Oko / Calvin Hence1-6, 0-6
2026-06-17vs Glenn/Glenn/Maumelle/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesEliza Gaines / Robert Gaines vs Sonjia Loftis / Kevin Golden0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDan Parfitt / Whitney Parfitt vs Reymond Koplen / Lacey Watts1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Parkey / Melanie Prince vs Carley Glenn / Spencer Jones4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-09vs Pinter/LR/BPWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaeghan Overley / Sam Overley vs Julie Steel / Carter Morris0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Prince / Jonathan Parkey vs Sydney Breaker / George Rainey6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEliza Gaines / Robert Gaines vs Meagan Wood / Michael Castens6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-02vs Sisoukrath/Benton/RebsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSam Carter / Heather Carter vs Sarah Sisco / Kaushik Nerusupalli0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Parkey / Melanie Prince vs Ashley Cliff / Bradley Heird6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEliza Gaines / Robert Gaines vs Johnathan Armstrong / Amy Lane6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Poole/LR/Rebs7117716168
2Brown/Craft/LR/Rebs6218613140
3Glenn/Glenn/Maumelle/BP6218615160
4Abston/LR/Rebs44121228228
5Smouni/Rockefellar/LR/PVCC35101428214
6Parfitt/LR/CCLR3571739254
7Kibbey/LR/Rebs2691536242
8Shepherd/Worley/LR/Reb0842043261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Hannah Rabinowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Whitney Parfitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Eliza Gaines
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Maeghan Overley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Melanie Prince
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.88
Jonathan Parkey
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Brian Ross
published 3
Heather Carter
published 3
2.75
Sam Carter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Dan Parfitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Sam Overley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Justin Rabinowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Gaines
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sydney Ross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Prince + Jonathan Parkey3742% games+8.6% vs expected
Maeghan Overley + Sam Overley0722% games−20.3% vs expected
Whitney Parfitt + Dan Parfitt1429% gamesnot enough data
Sydney Ross + Brian Ross134 matchesnot enough data
Justin Rabinowitz + Hannah Rabinowitz044 matchesnot enough data
Eliza Gaines + Robert Gaines213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Rabinowitz
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Whitney Parfitt
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Eliza Gaines
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Maeghan Overley
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Melanie Prince
19W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Jonathan Parkey
21W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Brian Ross
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Heather Carter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sam Carter
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Dan Parfitt
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Sam Overley
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Justin Rabinowitz
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Robert Gaines
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sydney Ross
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.